Getting the best possible exam results is what they do and everyone knows that! It’s not really an unsuitable atmosphere unless dc cannot bear to be second best. Someone even has to be bottom!
I'm not sure I understand this. They are very different schools. Perhaps PP could reveal which of these schools she has knowledge of. It seems a very MN, damn with faint praise, view, of the sort that is often not backed by real experience. .
Mine were at Westminster, one there from 13, the other starting in sixth form. The was no sense that they or their friends felt under pressure, though a minority of others might have been anxious and dealing with over-high parental expectations. The school, if anything, did its best to avoid adding to the problem.
One difference, perhaps advantage, that Westminster has over St Pauls is that it operates like a boarding school. Longer hours, Saturday school and a house system. The joy is that it keeps pushy parents at arms length. Your contact is with the Head of House and apart from parents evenings or when specific problems arise, teachers are left to get on with educating your children. There are also virtually no academic prizes and no prize-giving for parents to attend. You, and your children, tend to have little idea how others are performing. My daughter captained a sports team and they had a terrific cup run, with the head and his wife regularly turning up to support them. If you read the school news you would have thought that was a greater achievement than her friend who was selected for an international maths Olympiad team.
The point about Westminster is that it offers a broader education. Yes it gets terrific results, as it should with good teaching and a very selected intake. But pupils are expected to do more: to take part in school activities whether music, drama or an ice marathon in Finland. There are two full afternoons of sport each week, as well as weekend matches and inter house sport competitions, with the emphasis on taking part and with a wide range to suit almost everyone. Exams and marks are not the focus. Pupils are expected to contribute in class, and discuss and learn how to research and think for themselves, and defend their ideas within a very talented group.
As a result DCs peers are off doing some amazing things. scholarships in Singapore to study robotics, president of the Oxford Union, cox of the winning Cambridge crew, driving an F1 car, finalist in BBC young musician of the year, the list is long and varied and none of them are yet 25. My DC are doing nothing as starry but they picked up that they can aim high, but this ambition needs to be matched by hard work, focus and a range of skills.
The most important thing for us was that both really enjoyed their time at Westminster. Our daughter in particular. Two years was way too short.