I have yr 6 twins. Above average academically but not stellar (Dd2 stronger than dd1). Semi rural, comprehensive only, no 11+ in our area.
2 options - one is a newly high flying academy. Good gcse results, excellent on the attainment 8 score. Great facilities and links with community. My ex teacher mother thinks it looks great. But it makes me exhausted. It's so in your face. Dd1 scared of it (partly as her friends are mostly applying to the other school but also some fundamental discomfort).
Option two is closer. Has a needs improvement ofstead but the most recent report (jan last year) was hugely positive about improvement, discipline and pastoral care was always good in any case and it's becoming an academy with a trust which has a small roster of schools which have all improved with them. Sports facilities good (dds both sporty so this is important) plus community minded, drama and music clubs (dd1 is a great guitarist). Parents I know with kids there all happy. Gcse results slightly above average with girls doing much better than average (which does suck but I have girls.....). Mother approves of maths curriculum as ex secondary school maths teacher and gcse tutor.
So I am tending towards school 2 mostly because it doesn't make me want to rip my ears off with constant talk of Russell Groups every 30 seconds. However my final pauses are:
School 2 only does one language but does do the option of 3 separate sciences. Dd2 is very much a maths/science person so this is good for her but not sure about dd1 who is more humanities/arts focused I would guess. Although who really knows at 10!
School 2 chooses gcse options in year 9 whereas school 1 chooses in year 8. This is a new shift post ofstead and has been commended so I'm guessing a good thing but what's the difference?
I am totally in over thinking territory now - the academic child of teachers in me makes me think I must put school 1 down first but i don't really want to!