Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

First day in school. Are we in Germany 1933?

63 replies

andlondon · 21/04/2020 13:18

(I believe my post will be removed, as there is no democracy here and all think like one, but I cannot keep silence anymore).

First day in school (online) after holiday. DD got the following problem to solve (and kids widely discuss it on a chat):

In a hospital ward there are four terminally ill people. Three need medicines that are not in stock and cannot be provided. Without the medicines they will die. The fourth will die anyway. The three can be saved with organ transplantation: first with heart, second with lungs, third with liver. What should be done: (a) nothing and then all four will die. (b) kill the fourth and transplant his organs to other three.

Have you seen the movie “Life Is Beautiful” 1997? In fascist Italy the school children were given a problem: ‘How much will the country save if they stop feeding the mentally ill?’

So our children in school are hinted with the following: the government will not lift a finger in order to produce masks, ventilators, protective equipment etc. We don’t need to think about this. We just need to decide: who will die and who will live. Whom to connect to ventilator and whom do disconnect. Whom to send to intensive care and whom to send home to die.

If this is not fascism then what is this?

The government and the prime minister did not lift a finger to close airports, to trace and isolate infected and to test people when the epidemy was already ravaging in four countries: China, South Korea, Japan, Italy. The government did nothing to produce ventilators, masks, hand gel, protective suits. How did South Korea and Japan manage to completely stop this? Why in Germany 4,500 dead and in UK 16,000?

Why the criminal government and its prime minister are not investigated and not sent to court for sabotaging the struggle with the epidemy, for the treason to their people, for 16,000 dead?
Why instead of saying that “We will struggle for every ill person and we will do anything to save lives” the prime minister says “Oh, you need to prepare yourself to loose many of your relatives and friends”? and why that prime minister ignores five meeting in a row of the COBRA (Emergency Cabinet)?

Why do we need, like the North Koreans, to clap to NHS - where doctors and nurses are not provided with basic equipment and die from the infection, whilst in other countries healthcare workers have all they need? Why do people clap to them like to clowns who dance under the circus dome without any protection?

Is human life valued at all in this country or we just need to say “Oh, I am so sorry that people die”? “Oh, it’s such a shame there are not enough masks”. “Oh, it such a shame people crowd outdoors without masks spreading virus and contributing to the death toll”.

But what can be done? Our country is so poor. We have no enough budget. We cannot produce masks. It is too hard for our industry. We cannot produce ventilators. We cannot produce virus test kits. We cannot produce hand gel. Our police is unable to dispense crowds. Out policemen don't have masks, equipment, cars. There are actually no policemen on the streets at all!

We could not close airports. Our airport workers don’t know how to do this. We could not deprive our citizens of the joy of going to ski in Italy and bringing the infection back with them, and we could not isolate them when they landed back in Heathrow/Gatwick. There are no isolation rooms there :( Such a shame!

So what can be done? Just nothing. It’s our fate. Let’s just choose whom to disconnect from the ventilator. And let's keep strolling outside - such a good weather! Perhaps some more elderly will get infected and die because we stroll outside, but come on! those elderly would have died anyway, right?

And let’s prepare to lose our relatives and friends. And don’t forget to say “sorry” on every occasion and in every direction, and clap to our brilliant government and the healthcare system.

OP posts:
Reteacher101 · 24/04/2020 10:03

It's, as everyone has said, a standard ethics/philosophy question. I would not personally issue it for online work and not during a pandemic, but can and have in a classroom.
It will have absolutely nothing to do with the government and the mistakes they have made however.
Would be better to rephrase your question and post in Coronavirus probably. It's a shit time all round and I can see why you feel angry.

RoLaren · 24/04/2020 10:13

As to the question of life at all costs, read about Hisashi Ouchi, a Japanese man who was kept alive after suffering from severe radiation burns. Horrific.

TitianaTitsling · 24/04/2020 10:32

Has OP said how old the DD is and is what subject questions been asked? There's a marked difference between asking a 7 year old as a random piece of homework and a 15+ as part of a chosen Philosophy course as pp have said!

CrazyTimesAreOccurring · 24/04/2020 10:50

No @TitianaTitsling despite being asked a few times. Too busy telling us we are all too uncultured to have watched the '1997 film Life is Beautiful' and dazzling us with facts

TitianaTitsling · 24/04/2020 12:22

Guys, this post was not really about philosophical ethical questions and dilemmas whose life to save and whose not. The post was about the time when these questions are asked. Can't work out if the post is actually about berating the teacher? Or it's just a foil to rant about the government, or just have a regular non-sensical rant?

Piggywaspushed · 24/04/2020 13:09

I've seen it!

cakeisalwaystheanswer · 24/04/2020 15:29

This is just Ethics, buckle up OP it sounds like your DC could be introduced to Peter Singer and speciesism next week.

Typical bloody teachers trying to teach kids to think, the govt needs to crack down on this sort of thing.

lanthanum · 24/04/2020 16:21

It's a fairly common sort of task to get teenagers thinking about ethical dilemmas. However in the current circumstances, it might have been more sensitive to stick to "who should we chuck out of the hot air balloon", as this one feels too close home.

In some ways, it would be good for them to debate the very real ethical dilemmas, but not if there's any chance that there's a child with a relative who has just gone into hospital and may or may not get a ventilator. Save that one for when this is all over (and when there's also a teacher in the room who can steer the discussion if needed).

geekaMaxima · 24/04/2020 18:34

This is why everyone hates moral philosophers.

(Ducks to avoid people who haven't seen The Good Place).

Imactually13 · 24/04/2020 21:47

Help me I’m new here can someone teach me the lingo What does DD and DH mean

RoseAndRose · 24/04/2020 21:59

www.mumsnet.com/info/acronyms

Geraniumblue · 24/04/2020 22:23

‘Life Is Beautiful’ is a lovely film.
My dd had a whole term of these sort of these ethical starter questions. Who would you chose to die? Under various given circumstances. She found it all a bit peculiar to be honest. They study some really grim stuff in school these days.

pointythings · 25/04/2020 17:11

I am unclear as to what you want, OP. Do you want this question never to be raised or discussed? Or do you think it should have been avoided during the COVID crisis? It's ethics. Both my DDs have talked through this question in RE. It's a topic worth thinking about.

And life does not have to be preserved at all costs. My grandmother had an assisted suicide in the Netherlands in 2006. It was what she wanted, it was her life to dispose of as she saw fit, within the law of the land. I wonder what your moral/religious background is that you should make a statement like that.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page