Hi
So DS was refused a place at his first choice due to
(a) there were more applications than places available andother children had a higher priority against the published oversubscription criteria and/or (b) they are grammar schools and your child has not been assessed as suitable for admission to a grammar school.'
(b) grammar school does not apply to DS so its reason (A)
DS has a diagnosis of
-Autistic spectrum disorder
-Global development delay
-Emotional difficulties
-Hyperactivity
-Attention difficulties
Academically he is 'as expected' but he is offered extra time to complete the work and he does have TA support on a one to one level for topics he struggles with such as PHSE and then during lessons within class in general. The current school offer fantastic support for DS.
DS's needs show themselves more on a social, emotional, communication and language level, which link to ASD.
He has an IEP and IBP but no EHCP.
There were 76 appeals last year for the academy in question and 7 were successful.
Has anyone ever been successful in winning an appeal based on SEN needs? My case heavily focuses on DS suffering more if he didn't get a place than the academy would if he did.
I have made a list of reasons why 1st choice school meets his needs more than any other school and although the points are valid and are strong, I don't know how significant they are in the eyes of a panel.
Evidence I have so far is a paediatrician letter proving his diagnosis, a letter from the head teacher, a letter from the senco officer and a letter from DS class teacher. Letters from current school are not just generic templates, they go into great depth and fully support why 1st choice meets DS needs over any other school.
Any advice or previous experiences would be much appreciated.