Camper: You asked «I see the 'interesting' articles in the Yorkshire Post run out at the point where the matter was referred to Crown Court. Anyone know what happened?»
I don’t, but I saw that the case was supposed to start on 10 July, but I did not manage to find it on the court website. Anyone?
And yes, clearly some changes have been made, but I don’t know enough (from mere googling) so cannot confirm whether or not he (the accused) or his family still has any involvement in governance, as employees or (ultimate, beneficial) ownership of the school or properties. Does anyone else know?
I’m sure the school SLT, staff, parents and pupils all hope to be able to put the allegations (despite most or all ties having been cut by now?) behind them asap. Probably the owners, whoever they are, so as well, as this must be hampering business at least to some extent: Many UK-based parents would (in my opinion) be all over this like a rash until entirely satisfied and reassured. I see the thick safeguarding policy has been revised several times recently. And given also e.g. the existence of the Wikipedia page on this - which is very easy to find for anyone, but may not be entirely correct or complete for all I know, so please don’t sue me if it is not! - the school should really stop the (in my opinion) counterproductive effort to keep a lid on this using legal threats to MN and posters who mainly just want to help other parents keep kids safe, happy, and ideally also well educated.
Again, this is all personal opinion and mere references to allegations made in other places - and even without any links - so hopefully this post has no legal exposure for MN or myself whilst also enabling parents who care about the more substantial issues raised —not including cabfares— to see what’s going on and reassure themselves