Hi there.
We are looking at secondary schools and were pleasantly surprised by the UCL Academy when we looked round. The kids were - as far as we could see - very dynamic, proactive, helpful and motivated.
I have two concerns however:
- They did not get an Outstanding in their OFSTED report because they apparently fail to cater to the brightest
- I spoke with the deputy head who was adamant that they sit no more than 9 GCSEs and 3 A'levels. I asked if this is the case even when they can handle the committment, and he was very resistant.I explained that I took 13 GCSEs and 4 A'levels and that that was back when the standard was higher, when GCSEs had only just come in. He assured me that the new tests are harder, with English and Maths being worth double the old scoring system, which goes counter to everything I hear in the press about exams getting easier.
Our eldest is very academic and self-motivated, and is sitting a number of selective school exams, but we are not wedded to them. We are however wary of sending him to a school which wouldn't allow him to stretch himself. My gut says that they may suffer from Tall Poppy syndrome, and that the environment works for bringing up the average, but not for allowing the most capable to excel further. I don't want a less ambitious school philosophy to hamper a future university choice.
Do you have any thoughts on this? I'd be very grateful if you have experience of UCL Academy or opinions on the current GCSE and A'levels one is expected to sit.