We have a few months, but starting to discuss secondary school with DC1 now.
We will have a choice of 2 secondaries. We moved to the area a year ago, and the primary school we were allocated wasn't our nearest school. It is a feeder school for school C.
Most children from the primary therefore automatically go to school C. It has a big intake from a wide area - some of the children from our school live close enough to walk (probably about a third of them), others need to take the bus or train - DC1 would have to take the train or bus.
However we actually live closer to school H. Lots of children from DC's school aren't in catchment (some are) - we are within walking distance (about a 25 minute walk.)
There are likely to be a few other children from DC's class going there, but probably not many.
School H doesn't have a feeder school system, - it has admission areas instead, but in practice the vast majority of the children will have gone to one of the other local primaries together, and will know each other.
I strongly feel one should go to the nearest school, but I am aware that this will mean DC1 having to start over socially again after a big move not that long ago, and again being thrown into an environment where lots of other people know each other.
Is it silly to take this into account? DC coped fine with the transition before, btw, and has made friends, but I just feel it is a shame to potentially lose the friendships which have already been made - which are obviously fairly new.