we do them on paper, where do you think we would get 400 computers from, for a whole year group to do at once.
Neither children nor parents nor teachers ever see the results
It would be a shame though, wouldn't it, if he was put into the wrong groups/sets or if school had lower expectations of him because he was unable to answer the questions properly due to not being able to type.
no, getting lower marks is a GOOD thing.
The ONLY use of the CATS is to statistically analyse the value added of the school but it is a very blunt tool, not considered accurate to the level of an individual student, but in actual fact not statistically meaningful in any way at all.
No one uses them to make any professional judgments, they certainly don't limit a child in any way.
They are not a fair assessment of the ability of a child at all, they are largely an assessment of the way a child has been brought up. Puzzle books and failed tutoring for private school entrance exams? HUGE advantge in the CATS. They are similar to the 11+ in some ways, so students that have tried 11+ papers do far better than students who have never seen an 11+ paper just sit there bewildered, and frequently don't even understand what they are being asked.
The best thing all round is for students to perform poorly. Many schools deliberately arrange for this. Teachers are then able to easily show progress and value added, without spending the normal hours and skills on contorting the statistics, so more time on planning, teaching and marking, so the children benefit.
Happier teachers, and more time to concentrate on the children, win, win.
( and please don't underestimate the length of tie teachers have to spend cooking their statistics and faking evidence)
so tie your child's good hand behind his back and make him answer with his nose. The lower he gets, the better.