I know of state schools in my backyard offering similar services and results, if not better, for absolutely nothing!
”As someone whose DD goes to a fabulous state school, I rather doubt this.”
Oh dear, but why are you so dismissive of state schools? Really, you should be very proud that your DD goes to a fabulous state school. And I’m not lying by saying there are state schools offering similar services - OK, maybe not to the extend and quality like those of premier public schools - but most certainly their academic results can seriously embarrass even the two schools named on this thread!
State schools like e.g. the Queen Elizabeth’s School (QE Boys) in Barnet, north London, regularly outperforms the likes of Eton and Winchester academically and sends dozens to Oxbridge each year. Take a look at the latest Sunday Times league table (pg 6). At No. 8 position it is the nation’s top state school and I do mean the very top. It is eight rankings higher than Eton and a whopping 3 dozen places (almost) above Winchester, the supposedly very academic school and all that; both of these two public schools you’d pay up to £¼m to attend and graduate.
QEB is free, of course, and so is the Henrietta Barnett School (Girls) snapping at the heels of Eton at No. 17 in the league table. Like I said, they are located at my backyard and you don’t find parents of both these schools drumming into your heads over and over again how very academic they are.
Let’s be honest, if I’d wanted a very academic school for my DS, I would have sent him to QEB and save myself loads of money and convenience. He would have gone there even at one year underage and still perform magnificently. But Eton could offer him quality extra-curricular activities in abundance not seen anywhere else in the world and still take care of his academics. For example, how many school kids can boast of having taken rides in a Chinook helicopter; spent weeks in the middle of an African jungle teaching English and Maths to jungle kids; going deep sea diving in the Red Sea; or an opportunity to spend a week as a private guest of the prime minister of a prominent Asian country, amongst other things?
On the other hand, what’s the point of sending a young kid at the start of his/her vulnerable and impressionable teenage years and throughout, away to a school only to be influenced and indoctrinated by one individual of a housemaster?
Someone is missing something fundamental - the whole point of education is to broaden the mind. You do that by going out listening to various people of learning, of experience, of expertise, of leadership, etc. You don’t sell yourself to one individual to indoctrinate you so that you live the rest of your life to be a carbon copy of him/her.