Can anyone offer a view? We have a place at Radley for our son, and liked it very much when we visited. We have also visited Charterhouse and liked it.
By the time our son is 13 we will be living pretty much between the two. On paper it seems simple as we have the place at Radley so no tests, etc., apart from CE of course.
I realise that Radley is full boarding but it seems there are matches, chapel, etc., that parents can attend so hopefully not as brutal as full boarding meant in my day. I note Charterhouse are also introducing more activities at weekends so there would be a choice between weekly or more full boarding there. The new headmaster was very impressive too i thought.
Our son is at a London prep school. He is not in the top set but is average or above in all subjects. He gets a lot out of pretty much all areas such as art, DT, etc., and is very sporty (although not rugby so much yet, which i know is a BIG thing at Radley).
I suppose what i am asking is, what are the main differences between the two apart from the full and weekly boarding aspect? They have the same CE requirement (which of course we have to meet for any of this to be relevant!) They both seemed similarly impressive! I get a whiff of 'you've got to be tough to survive at Radley', from various people. Is that a fair assumption? Both appear to have amazing pastoral care and both say there is little bullying these days. I know schools change a lot over the years and much 'hearsay' info i have is perhaps out of date.
Thanks for any pointers.