DD is 12. Last week she came home and said the teacher had told the class that none of them would be put forward to GCSE next year, based on an assignment they were given before the last holiday. They were advised to take 3 hours on it. DD did that. She got feedback that said 'what a pity' and highlighted all the things she hadn't done right.
Teacher said no one had spent 3 hours on it. How does she know? DD spent all afternoon on it, from 1pm to 5pm. Maybe she's not as quick as some kids, but the piece of work she turned out was beautifully presented with diagrams and quotes and allsorts. Looked fine to me.
If it was lacking in info, why didn't they just highlight that instead of making generalisations? Put in an enquiry asking why the kids were being told they wouldn't be put through and to ask for advice on issues. Flagged that feedback wasn't constructive and not positive. Child in danger of being turned off from a subject she loves.
Turns out, on talking to teacher that dd had picked an interesting topic, but hadn't covered certain areas. Teacher said she thought the assignment was too hard for them but was given it by head of history and had no choice but to issue it. We sorted things out for the future. She said she'd be more positive in future and give better instructions/guide of what needed to be done and more constructive feedback.
Opened up my email and found a missive from the head of history which has wound me up. He said that there had been no fault found with the teacher in any way, her feedback was fine, and he further added:-
"the two year KS3 is a challenging concept and I am sure the group in general and your daughter in particular will have the opportunity, in the imminent assessment, to record a more encouraging performance and one that reflects our estimate of ability."
Is this really patronising or am I being a bit precious?