The debate on single room vs. dormitory frankly, baffles me! I can fully understand why boarding schools that do not match up to Eton’s wealth and grandeur (and none does) advocate for dormitories and the so-called “advantages” a dormitory presents - that’s the only course of action they could take in a sales pitch, but I’m afraid it’s a very poor argument that does not hold water.
Come on, we are talking about 21st century teenagers here, not little toddlers that need to be kept together under some watchful eye. The fact is, although they each have their own bedroom at Eton, the boys hardly spend much time in there except of course, to sleep there at night and to do their EW and other personal work when they wish to be left alone. It is a place where they can call their own, where they keep their treasured personal belongings, e.g. a picture of their dog, family, etc. A place where one could put up a poster of Muhammad Ali in action right next to a poster of Thomas The Tank Engine without being ridiculed; a place where you could proudly hang up your Chelsea blue scarf on the wall without any objection from your Man U-supporter housemate. What can be more logical than that?
In his last two years there, I would be lucky if I could get to speak to DS on his mobile the early side of midnight. And when I finally did get him in his bedroom, the reasons given were always the same: “I’ve just come up from downstairs”, “I’ve gone to visit ‘Attila’ at Penn House“, “I’ve just returned from the X Society meeting which ended 10 minutes ago”, “We’ve just arrived back from Avon/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire . . . Warwickshire . . . for the rugby semi-final”, etc.
And of course, by design the boys are always together: at chapel, during lessons, at meal times, in the playing fields, drama, CCF, music, tutorials, etc.
So you see, the bulk of a boy’s time at Eton is spent with their peers and friends. It’s a god-sent to be able to have your own room. You don’t need to also go to bed together, thank you very much! 