I am a great believer in uniform but it pisses me off how the point of a uniform can be so blatantly misused if not actually abused by a school.
Surely the points are:
-To level the DC, no competition about who has the trendiest clothes
-To forge a sense of group identity and pride within the school
-If it is a highly regarded school, to make DC feel proud that they can claim allegiance to it whilst out in the community (e.g.Walking to and from school)
-To discourage antisocial behaviour as DC are easier to identify
-If it's a private, to demonstrate how rich the parents are that they can afford the fees
.
Within school, within certain guidelines, surely it's just about having clothes on your back?!
Though I don't like the DSs school uniform, black trousers, white badged polo, black badged sweatshirt (they did away with blazers'n'ties in 2002) they look OK, are worn fairly reasonably (apart from the deputy's on going battle with girls and skirt lengths!) and fit with the school's ethos of a relaxed yet focus approach to education.
They also nail the county's best GCSE results for a comp. every year. It is in a very leafy MC area with few social ills so maybe they don't even have to consider the 'discipline effect' or 'belonging to something effect' (other than a street gang) of a strict uniform as endorsed by some of the sponsored inner city academies that replaced badly failing comps.