I know a lot of people on MN have children who got all level 5s at KS2, and my son got mostly level 5s. I now have a younger child who is entering secondary school with 4a reading, 4b writing, 4A Maths and 5 Science. The school sets in 3 subjects and streams in the rest based on SATs results.
From what I've read, it seems that schools' value added scores are based on the progress children make between KS2 and end of KS4. So a child who goes in with a 5 should achieve at least a B, and a child who goes in with a 4 should achieve at least a C. Clearly this is going to have an impact on teaching, because schools will have to have higher goals for the children who came into school with level 5s.
I am really concerned by this. I don't think there is really any difference between my two children. End national curriculum levels were simply a difference in the teachers they had at primary school and have very little to do with the secondary school curriculum anyway. I am now worried that my younger child is going to have low expectations put upon her in terms of GCSE grades. She wants to become a teacher, which means she will have to go to university, and competition for places is getting more intense. I feel she is having doors closed to her based on a test at 11.
Does anyone have a child who went in with level 4s and was still expected or encouraged to get high grades? And if a school does have low expectations for a child, is it possible to fill in gaps at home to help them get decent grades at GCSE?