My dd due to start secondary in September, worn Clarks shoes all through juniors but thought as they start becoming slightly more independent, more peer pressure etc. I suggested that she could have shoes that were perhaps 'more fashionable'. So we started looking at what the girls at her new school are wearing and there is a large number of them wearing a black trainer type shoe with little diamontes and a red strip on the tongue these seemed quite practical, sensible, sturdy(ish) keep feet dry etc. etc. all the things we think of - so I enquired of one of the older girls who had a pair on and was told that they are Prada (no less) and cost between £180/£230 - after I'd picked my jaw off the pavement I quickly let my DD know that she wouldn't be getting a pair of them..... But it got me thinking. You see the 'older girls' prancing around with their skirts just covering their bums, with Prada shoes, Juicy Bags, Pauls Boutique jackets, Ralph Lauren whatevers etc. etc. and I think that these girls maywell be in school uniform but they must have about £500 worth of accessories. I know that the Head is clamping down on the length of skirts - no rolling them up whilst in school, but just exactly what are some of the parents up to letting them go to school with so much 'money' added to them, and what exactly is this teaching our DD. Is this just me, am I really that old fashioned, Is this just an Essex thing (I'm an ex.pat and no I'm not tarnishing everyone with the same brush). My DD may well be going back to Clarks for shoes!!