Sorry, but it's another "which school shall I choose?" dilemma. Just looking for some gut reactions from people that are already at secondary stage.
From your experience, which would you go for:
School A: Catholic state secondary, 800 pupils, has a history of poor attainment but has brought in a "super-head" who has generated an upward spiral of results over the last two or three years. Tight discipline, smart uniform, lots of fresh paint. Small sixth form, possibly a more limited range of subjects. Track record on getting children into top-flight universities is a bit unknown. AND although I loved the buildings and atmosphere at open day, the Head came across as arrogant and a bit of a control freak!
School B: State comp with 1500 pupils, no religious allegiances. Has a history of being a sought after school but reputation has slid over the last few years for reasons that no-one seems able to articulate. Buildings and students generally a bit scruffier than the other school, but not terrifyingly so. Parents of teenagers who are there at the moment seem happy. I know some 20-somethings who have been there and done very well at good universities. And the Head came across as having a very clear idea of her vision for the school, which includes a big focus developing children's leadership skills and character alongside academic achievement.
People worry about the second school because it is located in a rough part of town, but in reality the students are drawn from a similar catchment for both.
In terms of GCSE results, both are now similar. Ofsted reports are similar. Both within easy walking distance.
University performance is relevant because DH and I both went to Cambridge and there is every sign that DD1 is bright enough to head somewhere in that sort of league, if she is so inclined.