I find it very ignorant when people make sweeping comments about BTECs when they clearly have no idea what the qualifications are INTENDED to be for.
I teach BTEC Performing Arts at Level 2 and Level 3. In September, I will also be teaching GCSE Performing Arts, as there is sufficient demand at school. BTECs are simply a different sort of qualification. They have a vocational context, a slightly different focus and teach a different set of skills. In my opinion, certain, more practical subjects are better suited to BTECs than to GCSEs. I have signed off my final two Yr 11 students today, who have completed BTEC Level 2 Diploma over the last two years. The amount of work they have had to complete is phenomenal, despite the fact that there was no exam. They have each achieved a Distinction grade. This is NOT the same as 4 GCSEs at A, it IS the same as a BTEC Level 2 Diploma at Distinction*.
Noddy - you are wrong to say that BTECs are being "gradually phased out". No they're not. At Level 2, there have been some changes this year, adding in further elements which are externally assessed, to keep Mr Gove happy, but there have been no announcements about Level 3 BTECs being changed, let alone "phased out".
Again, at Level 3, BTECs are simply a different sort of qualification. BTEC Level 3 in practical or vocational subjects such as Performing Arts, Sport or Health & Social Care are highly appropriate ways of studying such subjects due to the ongoing practical assessment. I teach Level 3 BTEC in 6th Form and 3/4 of my class this year are going on to university to study either Drama or joint Drama/English Lit. In the past few years, I have had students go on to study Drama or English/Drama at a variety of universities including Cardiff and Bristol (RG) Of course BTEC Performing Arts isn't going to get anyone in to university to study Medicine, but then A Level Physics isn't going to get anyone onto a Drama degree.
The biggest issue with BTECs is the ignorance and snobbery with which people regard them.