Just wondered what peoples views were on this as it will be a point I'm raising at appeal for preferred secondary school. Didn't get preferred choices and have been allocated a school we hadn't even considered as worst performing school in area.
My son's primary school have actively promoted cycling to school, there are excellent storage facilities, the cycling proficiency courses are offered (Bikeability) which ds has taken full advantage of. The last course he did took them onto quiet roads preparing for cycling to secondary school if they wish. Our ds enjoyed it so much he really wants to ride his bike to and from new secondary school.
We have one problem though, he is colour blind (protanopia), and with regard to traffic signals, he has learnt top light means stop (he doesn't see light as red) and bottom light means go (doesn't see green), there are certain weather conditions where he can't see which light is lit at all. So, a bright sunny morning for instance would be a perfect day for cycling but if it is particularly bright he sometimes finds it difficult to see any light extinguished, and approaching in dusk or fog the same thing. So he would need to watch what the traffic is doing around him as well as watching the traffic signals on a very busy high street - this is allocated school journey, and far too dangerous to cycle, if we don't win appeal he won't be able to cycle to school.
We wanted to support his wish to cycle as we understand the healthy and long lasting benefits associated with cycling. Getting more children cycling to school is currently one of the Government's key objectives, TFL are encouraging it too as well as many local councils and schools.
We had many valid reasons for our preferred school choices, but this was one of them.
The preferred schools were more suited to our ds for a few important reasons but also would involve journeys via very quiet routes with excellent provisions in place for him to cycle to school.These routes were extremely safe.
Although we understand convenience of journey cannot be considered at an appeal, we are arguing that it's about safety whilst supporting his wish to cycle, obviously if he can avoid cycling through traffic signals it's considerably safer. we feel he should have a right to do this and be safe.
Any views, positive or negative would be helpful to listen to. Thanks.