This is fantastic - thanks so much.
You are so right about parental ignorance. The huge gap we have in the reality and the perception comes I think from our own experiences of technology and its connection with teen culture when we were younger.
To us (30s/40s +) open internet access, mobile phones and social networking has crept up on us very very recently. Facebook is only 8 years old! For our children though, it is something they have had all their lives and they are streets ahead in their understanding of just what a big deal technology is in their lives.
Maybe when they are parents, we might not have these sorts of problems. We are working at a phenominally slow pace in realising what a problem this has become.
I'm not being alarmist - if you could hear what I heard this week at school: an Ofsted 'outstanding' school, in a MN-friendly leafy and 'naice' area, one with an excellent reputation with pastoral issues and well-being... I suppose that the kids there are pretty relective what our (MN) kids are probably like...
The casual way that the boys concerned saw sex, the cruel way in which they spoke (online) about girls they knew, girls and women they did not know but had seen in pornographic images passed casually from phone to phone; the devastating effect this has had on girls who have attended the parties they all go to (with full parental permission) and the consequences of what has happened at these parties. It is horrible.
But do you know what is even more horrible? The attitude displayed by many of the mothers defending their son's behaviour and attitudes; the refusal to blame their sons for what they have been doing and the openly hostile attitude displayed towards the school in trying to deal with the fallout and tackle the problem. Articulate, professional women, coming out with phrases such as 'boys will be boys'; 'it's none of the school's business what my son does online' and even, even, to the headmaster 'You're a man - surely you can see why the boys use these images.'
Our own experiences of porn as kids I am guessing would have been sneaking peeks at parents' mags, stashed under beds and at the back of cupboards; of gathering around torn out pages from jazz mags on the playing fields or down the brook. And later, 'blueys' watched in a group at college or something. It was rare to see any, it bore very little resemblance to our own experiences (if any) of sex and it remained slightly out-of-reach (literally, on the newsagents' shelves!), quite exotic and probably fairly rare.
Our teens' experiences of porn could not be more polar opposite. Kids get sent pornographic images out of the blue, completely unsolicited, by other kids. Some willingly engage in swapping photos, videos and it becomes part and parcel of their phone usage. And even more worryingly, perhaps, is that vulnerable and impressionable girls join in with the idea that they will attract and impress lads if they too strip off and take photos of themselves or have photos taken of them. They take part in sexual acts at parties and boys talk about them afterwards. They rank them.
I don't think most parents have a clue about the extent of this. We definitely need to take this on as parents or we will (to use a much-hackneyed phrase) 'sleepwalk' into a very very worrying world of warped, damaging and dangerous sexual attitudes for our children. It's not just a one-off; something rare that happened at my school. It's all over.
Phew - turned into a bit of a rant. But it has made me really sad and really angry this week. I will start my investigations into the excellent links you have kindly provided.