Not sure where to put this.
DS has always been very articulate, loves words, rhymes, puns, loves books. He took ages learning to write, and then his spelling was poor. The school referred him to be checked for dyslexia when he was 7. The report said that he wasn't dyslexic, and that such an able child shouldn't have been referred!
School referred him again at age 9. That report said that he wasn't dyslexic, that he had a high IQ, and that there was a discrepancy between his "reading age" of 13+ and his "spelling age" of 8, which suggested that something wasn't quite right, but they didn't know what. He was given remedial spelling lessons which helped a bit.
He's now making very heavy weather of secondary. His teachers say he's great in class, can answer questions verbally which show he has a good grasp of the subjects, but it all falls apart in written tests/exams. He makes endless silly mistakes (e.g. in maths writing down a figure and then misreading his own writing) and his exam technique is non-existent (e.g. spending as long on a 2 mark question as a 6 mark question, running out of time and leaving questions unanswered etc.) We have gone over and over exam technique with him, as have his teachers, but he cannot seem to "get" it.
Should we just keep plugging away at him, or should we try to have him re-assessed (would have to go private, as he is too bright to qualify for council help) and find out if there is a reason for his difficulties?