Thanks for the responses: I think as going has correctly pointed out, my 'gripe' such as it is, is that they make such a song and dance about the importance of doing homework, the value it adds to the DCs education etc etc... yet the school then trash the whole edifice by practically not setting it for the last term! There are few issues of not-done homework at the school (most DCs come from very committed families), but if it's not done the DC's are punished, albeit via 10 minute detentions- it's seen as a disciplinary 'offence'.
The school, on Open Day and so on really push the point that they have discovered the Holy Grail of boy-achievement: little and often, in other words a slow, steady consistent approach to getting things done; yet that can hardly be said of their approach to Y7 homework!
I'd be more than happy if DS's homework was learning MFL vocab, reading a passage they're about to study in English, running through a pre-printed maths worksheet of 10 relevant questions, discovering the meanings of 5 geographical terms etc.
As for the 'fab results', yes, like an OFSTED, fantastic on paper BUT the thing is, one way in which they obtain these results is via, as I already said, only putting DCs forward for the exams they're bound to pass. So for example my DS (who, absolutely fwiw, got a 5 in his KS2 Maths SATS), has just been placed in group 3 of 5 in Maths. He is in danger of being only allowed to take Foundation Maths or double science. I know he is well capable of Higher Maths and Triple science but it may not be in the schools interests to push him forwards into things he might 'fail'. But it's hard to know where he's struggling if we never see any evidence of what he's doing and what level!
Being a typical 'boy', (and despite what you might be thinking, i.e having an hysterical mother
), he does what he has to and nary a jot more. So you can see why if 'doing what he has to' included 45 minutes of carefully targeted homework a night, he might ultimately do better.
As it is 2 small doors have closed on him: All of group 1 in Maths (who to be fair contains 3 DCs with Maths 'A' levels, aged 11...) and most of group 2 get to do a Statistics GCSE in Y10. The top 1/3 in MFL get offered a second language, DS hasn't. By his own admission DS agrees he could have done better in his MFL had he learned more vocab. We, of course, due to the lack of seeing his books (no homework!) weren't able over the course of the year to gently but consistently encourage the learning of the vocab. He is also a bit
as he realises the 'setting by stealth' has already begun.
You may say 'Well, in secondary, it's up to them'. I would see your point but I'd say it'd be unfair to expect an 11 year old boy to be able to self-direct his own learning, especially when the consequences of inability or immaturity have a direct impact on their life choices.
Sorry I'm banging on about this- but as you can see, and you only need to be a denizen of 'Education' in MN for a short while to recognise this- in the state system, you have to be prepared to be a squeaky hinge or at least be prepared to 'advocate' for your DC!