Oh, WaxOn you're back. When you said i'm done with this as it's pointless I took that as a flounce. I like debating this subject because I think it's very important, so I'm glad you're still keen to engage.
However, I would appreciate not being called bonkers and or accused of having an agenda (no idea what that would be - I'm not a politician!)
My view is pretty simple, I think. There are two types of parents who might want to send their child to a GME school. The first type is parents who speak Gaelic, and might reasonably like their child to be educated in their own language in the country where that language originated and is still spoken. I think that's a moral right.
The second type is parents who don't speak Gaelic but who'd like their child to learn Gaelic to fluency. As Scotland is the country where Gaelic originates and is most widely spoken, I also think it's morally right to give both types of parent that option in a state education system.
Unlike you, I think children with special educational needs should absolutely take priority over a parents wish to educate their child in gaelic.
I just think this is a false dilemma. They shouldn't be placed in opposition. Why not fund both?
What is it about the current system that you think is unfair? Is it that you think Gaelic education provision disadvantages children with SENDs? Because I completely agree that there should be more funding and provision for children with SENDs, but I just don't see how this has anything to do with Gaelic as opposed to other spending considerations. It's not either/or. Neither of these is a luxury.
I don't really see the benefit of them learning maths etc in gaelic unless they want to be a gaelic maths teacher.
Maths is the same in every language. There's no Gaelic Maths. The terms are just explained in Gaelic in GME, which is better for learning if that's the language the kids are used to being taught in