I have a situation at my sons school which I am at a loss to know how to resolve.
My son is doing Higher Computer Science (with Maths, Physics, Chemistry and Music) . He wants to go off to University to read Computer Science and then train to teach Computer Science at Secondary level.
Since the session started in August 2016 he has had 5 Computer Science teachers. He has needed this many because they keep leaving! The first, Mr R , was there for 2 weeks. The second, Mr S was there in parallel with Mr R and then for approximately 2 weeks on his own. The next, Mr B, was a retired teacher who came in on a part time basis for some of my sons lessons but not all. Mr B left before teacher number 4, Mr SL, started so the group had some time with no teacher. Once Mr SL arrived he stayed approximately a month before he too left. One of the school deputes, is now teaching my son as teacher number 5 but she is being required to do this whilst simultaneously timetabled to teach a different group of students, in a different classroom, working towards a lower examination level.
I know the school cannot conjure up a teacher out of thin air so my issue is really in their attitude and relationship with the SQA. I have been told by the HT that the school has verbally informed the SQA that this group have had their studies disrupted by all these changes but that the SQA responded by saying the difficulties experienced do not constitute exceptional circumstances i.e the students will be given no allowances for any of this disruption when they sit their exams in just 2 months time. They have now agreed to write to the SQA.
To my mind (as a former senior teacher) the problem is greater than the number of teachers this Higher group has had and the simultaneous timetabling of teacher Number 5 (although this is all the school are prepared to write in their letter). Five teachers bring 5 different pedagogical approaches into the classroom so in the limited times this group has had a teacher in front of them they have started, changed direction and restarted significant elements of their course (including the major project worth 60% of the exam grade) – a demoralising waste of effort and energy.
The recent Computer Science Prelim exam was the last to be handed back. My child got a B (so no disaster) but other didn't fair so well. I have been told by the head teacher that ‘gaps’ in their knowledge have already been spotted by teacher number 5 but he has every faith that she can fill these gaps by going over the entire course in the next 2 months! Although she is an excellent teacher, I fail to see how any teacher can do this especially when you consider she teaches another group for 4 of their 6 lessons.
I believe the disruption suffered by my son’s Higher Computer Science group must be exceptional (if it isn’t then Scottish education is in very deep trouble) and as such the SQA must make allowances before grades are awarded to these students.
Another parent who raised the same issue with the school was told admitting our experience fell under SQA ‘ Exceptional Circumstances provisions’ would be politically difficult.
What if anything can I do?