Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Retirement

Planning your retirement? Join our Retirement forum for advice and help from other Mumsnetters.

NHS pension disappointment.

570 replies

Stillearninglife · 06/05/2025 05:58

After 33 years in the NHS I have been battling with pensions as they “lost” years and years of my pension due to “clerical errors “.
Now I have a prediction which I intend on taking at 55.

Seemingly one of the best pensions around, reading of other people’s pensions, it is utterly crap.

33 years with a lump sum of less than £80k then monthly payments of less than £800 per month is so low. All those years at B7 diligently paying in thinking I will be ok financially and it’s just dire.

I left the NHS due to conditions and pay some time ago (2 years ago) so nothing is going into the pot, so I’m taking it at 55 next year.

Anyone had similar experience with NHS pension?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
TheHerboriste · 07/05/2025 00:56

55 is young to collect.

NoBinturongsHereMate · 07/05/2025 01:02

It may or may not be the best financial decision, depending on individual circumstances, but it's perfectly possible to take it at 55. And if the OP had had SCS, it would have been a very good idea to take advantage of that.

caringcarer · 07/05/2025 01:10

My DH worked in civil service for most of his career. He took his pension at 60. If he had worked until 67 it would have been much higher. He couldn't because of poor health so he took it at 60 and it got accuarily reduced. He took a slightly lower lump sum to add to his monthly pension. If it's left it goes up by inflation each year.

BG2015 · 07/05/2025 06:27

I don't know anything about NHS pensions (I'm a teacher) but fellow teachers who I'm involved with on another group have often had similar where they have gaps or missed service. They usually have missing payslips too.

They have contacted HMRC who have been able to provide them with evidence of their pay and pension contributions which has then enabled them to rectify missing service.

Is this something you could do?

FeatherDawn · 07/05/2025 06:33

It is but it was the normal age that Nurses, Midwives and Physiotherapists could retire under Special Classes rules in the 1995 section .
Have you ever heard the phrase that older men look for " a nurse with a purse"😂
It refers to wealthy older women but came about because nurses have good pensions and could retire early.

NoBinturongsHereMate · 07/05/2025 09:40

That phrase is more of a US one, so has nothing to do with NHS pensions. Or actual nurses, who even in the UK have only quite recently had good pensions - historically they were incredibly poorly paid. Even now most have 'a good pension for their salary' rather than an objectively huge one.

doodahdayy · 07/05/2025 10:36

FeatherDawn · 07/05/2025 06:33

It is but it was the normal age that Nurses, Midwives and Physiotherapists could retire under Special Classes rules in the 1995 section .
Have you ever heard the phrase that older men look for " a nurse with a purse"😂
It refers to wealthy older women but came about because nurses have good pensions and could retire early.

I thought a nurse with a purse was someone who would pay and care for her oh, not the profession.

FeatherDawn · 07/05/2025 10:38

It was in use in UK years ago when I started nursing, told to watch out for older men seeking a younger woman to look after and keep him in old age ..."Watch out Duck, he's after a nurse with a purse"
Northern nursing accommodation circa 1985 😂

I'm sure it's spread to US but a quick Google shows the origin
Purse means handbag in the US not purse as in the UK

Nursing pensions have always been good , retire age 55 on a good pension?
It's why so many put up with the conditions -the promise of a decent, guaranteed pension
Not so good now so nurses are leaving in droves

FeatherDawn · 07/05/2025 10:39

doodahdayy · 07/05/2025 10:36

I thought a nurse with a purse was someone who would pay and care for her oh, not the profession.

Yes it means that but the origin is nurses with good pensions

Stillearninglife · 07/05/2025 12:44

BG2015 · 07/05/2025 06:27

I don't know anything about NHS pensions (I'm a teacher) but fellow teachers who I'm involved with on another group have often had similar where they have gaps or missed service. They usually have missing payslips too.

They have contacted HMRC who have been able to provide them with evidence of their pay and pension contributions which has then enabled them to rectify missing service.

Is this something you could do?

Thank you, I have already rectified the missing years thank goodness but it took ages and was an awful lot of back & forth.

OP posts:
Stillearninglife · 07/05/2025 12:45

TheHerboriste · 07/05/2025 00:56

55 is young to collect.

Circumstances often dictate this decision though, so not sure what your point is?

OP posts:
tryingtobesogood · 07/05/2025 14:42

@Stillearninglife If you do decide to take the pension, you might be able to add to your other more valuable pension through salary sacrifice, where you give up part of your salary to be added to your pension pre tax, increasing the value of that pension when you come to take it. This may net you more money in the long term.

Boost your pension with salary sacrifice | MoneyHelper

Lavenderblue11 · 07/05/2025 17:26

That seems ok to me. I got £34k and £530pm after 24 years (1995 pot). I take it you haven't been B7 for 34 years?

Thomasina79 · 07/05/2025 17:34

I retired from the nhs about three years ago. I was in an admin role. My pension, after working for 20 years,is just under £500. £800 sounds like a good pension to me!

Horserider5678 · 07/05/2025 17:40

Blondebrownorred · 06/05/2025 06:10

Yes this. It's so low because you're taking it so early.

Also I’m guessing she’s taking the maximum
lump sum! She has a choice to take a smaller lump sum and get a larger monthly payment!

BeWiseGuide · 07/05/2025 17:40

please check - i think you lose SCS from finishing - to have your pension at 55 you need to be in a substantive post!

Dodgethis · 07/05/2025 17:44

Stillearninglife · 06/05/2025 06:14

The pot is sitting there. No further contributions into it, not growing so won’t be worth anything higher at pensionable age. I might as well take it at 55.

Try to get some advice, because this isn’t true. If you retire later you will get more. 55 is incredibly early to retire, I probably wont be able to retire until I’m well over 70.

Also the people saying the bigger the lump sum the smaller the monthly payment are correct. Again, it’s worth you getting some advice!

HardyHiker · 07/05/2025 17:45

It sounds low. I retired as a top Band 6 (I mainly worked nights) in 2023 with almost 34 years and mine is more than that. I was in the 1995 section with special class status so I was able to retire at 55 without reduction. I returned on 24 hours and now contribute to the 2015 pension. You are a deferred member and have lost special class status as you need to be in a qualifying role on your 55th birthday, so your normal pension age is 60 and there will be a reduction for taking it early. That being said it is low, and seems like you still have some missing years? Remember, the 1995 pension closed in 2022, you should have a choice as to whether you want the years from 2015 to 2022 to go back into the 1995 or stay in the 2015. Do your figures include the rollback? Your pension will be calculated on your salary from when you left, uplifted for inflation.
If you are on Facebook there are a couple of good groups you can join. Pen-gage is brilliant and has loads of information for free. They also do free webinars which are really informative and you can pay for individual advice if required.

HardyHiker · 07/05/2025 17:51

Seeyousoonboo · 06/05/2025 06:28

This is incorrect.
The reason your monthly income will be £800 is because you’re taking the pension early. If you take it later, the monthly pay will be more.

You are wrong if OP has special class she can take her 95 section at 55 in full without reduction. Why do people keep typing stuff when they obviously don't know the facts?

You have to be employed in a qualifying role within the NHS to maintain special class status. If not your normal pension age reverts to 60.

Luluco · 07/05/2025 17:53

What is the normal retirement age of your pension scheme as if it’s 65 it will be a large reduction that is applied to retire 10years early. Have you received a projection for retiring at normal pension age so you can compare?

MCCN · 07/05/2025 17:54

£800 a month is £9,600 pa, which you could easily be getting for 30 years if you start taking it at 55. This would add up to £288k. You're also getting an £80k lump sum, presumably tax-free. In total that's £368k.

In fact you'll get more than that because I imagine your pension payments will be increased by inflation each year? So it's £368k in today's money but you'll actually receive more.

Would you feel better if you thought of it like a "pot" of £368k? It's just that you don't get it all upfront.

IhadaStripeyDeckchair · 07/05/2025 18:00

The thing about pensions is that the last few years are the ones that really ratchet up their value.

If you take it at 55 instead of 58 that's 16 years of investment & compound interest you're loosing.

It's not a crap scheme, it's you taking the money out far earlier than is the norm that is significantly reducing your pension.

HardyHiker · 07/05/2025 18:02

Seeyousoonboo · 06/05/2025 06:34

@helpfulperson The 95 section is not a defined pension, it is a final salary pension. AGAIN for the people at the back the 95 section closed in 2022 NHS staff cannot put any more money into this pot. If OP has special class she is entitled to take this IN FULL at 55 WITHOUT reduction or 60 in my case as I am 48.

She doesn't have scs as a deferred member. You have to be employed in the NHS in a qualifying role on your 55th birthday to retain it.

carpool · 07/05/2025 18:04

If you retire at age 55 then of course the monthly amount will be less because they will be paying you potentially for 40 years (if you lived to 95) whereas if you retired at 65 then it would be for 30 years. If they are having to fund you for possibly an extra 10 years of life then the amount you get each year will be less - it is basic arithmetic. I am also NHS pensioner and would have got less than I do if I had taken it before age 65.

NoBinturongsHereMate · 07/05/2025 18:05

IhadaStripeyDeckchair · 07/05/2025 18:00

The thing about pensions is that the last few years are the ones that really ratchet up their value.

If you take it at 55 instead of 58 that's 16 years of investment & compound interest you're loosing.

It's not a crap scheme, it's you taking the money out far earlier than is the norm that is significantly reducing your pension.

Not relevant for the NHS pension, which is a defined benefit scheme.

Swipe left for the next trending thread