Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

I’m pregnant and don’t know what to do about my wedding

56 replies

YourSunnyGreenOP · 09/11/2025 01:14

I (26f) have just found out I am 5 weeks pregnant. It was unplanned, I was on birth control however I was also taking some medication that I admittedly did not read the side effects on which was that birth control may be defective while taking. We were trying before starting contraception but I said I would be going on birth control for a set period to avoid a 2nd/3rd trimester pregnancy or having a newborn when we wed which my partner agreed with.

I will be due to give birth 7 weeks before the wedding. So it is still early days but me and my partner (36m) are already arguing what we should do about the wedding. I have been planning this wedding for 1 year, I have put a lot of savings into it to set us up financially for those big monthly costs to be reduced at his request and of course intentionally was on birth control to stop this exact situation from happening. He said he wants to either cancel the wedding entirely to then revisit in 5-10 years or keep it exactly as it is. I want to move it by 8 - 15 months.

He has said his reasons are financial and the fact we have already committed to the date. We can cancel and say goodbye to our money we have already put down or keep the date and deal with it. He only took into account that we only have £4000 left to pay off in eight months for the wedding which is doable on our current salaries but doesn’t realise, despite explaining, we WILL need to save for the baby’s arrival and that we will need to buy all baby items and spend money on preparing a room in our house, not even taking into account a buffer fund for when bills are higher than normal or if we are hit with an emergency, like the boiler breaking, house repairs, baby proofing or needing to replace things like furniture.

I don’t know if I will physically be recovered within 7 weeks to have a whole day where we are the main attention, I must have a dress fitting and measurements taken 12 weeks before the wedding date which I will be in my 3rd trimester unless I pay extra to put a rush on it on top of alteration costs but again don’t know if I can pop out a baby and be measured in the same week due to not knowing how I will be physically. I could still be bleeding upto 8 weeks after birth, could end up having a c-section, I won’t have enough time to lose baby weight to fit into my already brought dress even without it being fitted, I won’t be able to have a celebratory drink if I’m breast feeding and I don’t want to parm my child onto my parents and his during their first wedding of any of their kids. If baby is only two months old they will need more shielding from illness and sickness than a 1 year old and his logic is we will give our guests without a role shifts to watch our child which I don’t like the thought of not only for my child’s health by interacting with so many people in one day but also I don’t think it’s right that we expect our friends and family to have to leave our wedding for an hour long shift of holding our child, soothing them, changing nappies or feeding them.

And I don’t want to cancel it either as I have put down money on this wedding from my savings and have been the person who has dealt with all the vendors, booked everything, planned the perfect honeymoon, did all the running around and dealing with people on questioning every decision I make. I’m not losing £4000, £1500 of which is my personal money that was meant to be used for a new car but was convinced to use to help pay off the wedding prior to us finding out we were expecting, when I already have spoken to our venue and honeymoon agent and can get things moved at minimal additional cost (I’ve been offered 10% of original prices on top for changing dates as both venue and honeymoon have been generous given the circumstance instead of 10% and additional admin fees and charging us extra for a weekend date or for any perks we had for free as I waited for deals to roll in before booking ) and that would allow us to save for our baby and still pay off the wedding in full if moved by 8-15 months, we may be slightly indebted before the wedding but I again have additional savings that can help with this and estimate in a worst case scenario we would be indebted by £1000 by going off higher end prices within my research. I will need to check other vendors aswell but have a good feeling as plenty of them are saying they have openings for 2027 dates but will need to check before saying for definite. I luckily earn commission within my job so while I will only be on less than £1000 for maternity pay and child benefit, I will still earn commission and office bonuses while on maternity which can range from between £200 - £1000 extra a month, whether this is taxed I don’t know.

He says the wedding is materialistic and we can marry in 5-10 years if I am so set on pushing it back. I always knew a child would be his number one priority over a house, pet, holiday or wedding if for any reason he had to choose between them but I thought he would be understanding to my financial justification and just how I feel about wanting my wedding I have worked hard to put together and not let the money we have already spent (which is higher if you factor in our honeymoon) go to waste. He has tried to convince me I will be fine to carry on life as usual quickly after the birth as he has spoken to two women about how their births went but I unfortunately follow medical advice and don’t want to take a chance on potentially not being okay physically or mentally. I was in the NICU when I was 6 weeks to 12 weeks old, I was perfectly healthy in the womb and upon birth but caught an infection and do not want to risk going through anything like that with my child while also facing a fast approaching deadline of my wedding.

Please tell me your honest opinions and what you would do in this scenario, I will admit my decision making is mostly financially driven and with my health and babies health at the centre of reasoning but I do not, selfishly, want to give up my special day because of it or cancel entirely and lose the money that is already out of our pockets. I could be convinced if I knew we were getting at least a 80% refund on the total of the wedding and that would be enough for baby essentials and thrifting any big items we would need and would just need to save up a buffer fund for any unexpected bills which is doable in 7-8 months without a cost of a wedding looming over us but I feel we are at a stale mate.

I don’t know if it’s worth mentioning but I had made the suggestion when I first found out that we explore all options and he said termination was not an option he would consider and would put our relationship on the line, I accepted knowing this was something we were worried wouldn’t happen given us previously trying but i said would really want the wedding moving simply due to it being too soon after I give birth, which he agreed and is why I spent time researching our options and speaking with our big cost vendors so this has taken me by surprise.

OP posts:
Thatsalineallright · 09/11/2025 07:05

I'm not sure if this is a wedding issue at all. Based on your post, in doesn't sound like you and your dp are on the same page when it comes to important events (marriage is an incredibly significant legal contract) and finances (money is often the cause of fights and divorce between couples).

If I were in your shoes I'd do one of those pre-marriage courses where they help you discuss all the common issues so that you can be more on the same page going into marriage.

And definitely get married before the baby comes. You earn almost the same now but the woman is almost always the one to take the financial hit when having kids. It's sensible to be protected from day one, not in 10 years like your dp seems to be envisioning.

Dinosaursare · 09/11/2025 07:21

My friend is getting married 2 weeks post baby, its her 2nd and they want to register him as married so when for a small 2 by 2 in the local Library. I would say scale back and get married. I would also be cautious of a partner who would say 5-10 years?! As the next best alternative, marriage protects us and he seems quite happy to avoid that with strange threats

BeingATwatItsABingThing · 09/11/2025 07:31

I would want to do the ceremony sooner and the party later.

There is no way I would have had any of my babies (I’ve had 3) with someone else for a full day at that age. I would have hated every second.

After my first, I would have probably fitted in the dress by that point but I had only just got over feeling achy post birth. After my second, I probably would have been fine for the dress and partying all day. I did actually attend a wedding 10 weeks after my third (c-section) but I was a guest. I was tired by the end but coped. If it had been my day, I would have struggled.

I personally think the only really viable of your plans is to go with delaying it 8-10 months. If you push it back 5 years, it won’t happen because you’ll have more children and costs really can spiral when you have kids.

OhDearMuriel · 09/11/2025 07:46

ittakes2 · 09/11/2025 02:10

I would go through with it and ask for baby stuff for wedding presents. Your 26 very likely you’ll physically bounce back in 2 months

This

user1492757084 · 09/11/2025 07:49

Get your Dad over pronto and have your wedding sooner without so much fanfare.

Look beautiful, have people you want to be there and do it while you are not huge, tired and not able to dance.
Go for a church, great music, flowers, a nice pub or someone's back yard BBQ.

Velvian · 09/11/2025 07:57

Bring the wedding forward to before the birth. You and your baby's future is more important than a perfect day, far more.

If you give birth before, make sure you give the baby your name, even if it is 7 weeks after. It is a red flag that he wants to postpone 5 to 10 years! I predict that he will flip at the idea of the baby not having his name only. You will need re-register your child after marriage, so can change their name at that time.

You mentioned that you were thinking of a termination. That is entirely your choice. It may be the end of the relationship, but that may be better than the alternative.

HewasH2O · 09/11/2025 08:09

It sounds as though the wedding is of more importance to you than a marriage. If so, move the photo booth & cake, get some nice pictures taken at some point in the future and they will be a nice reminder of your wedding.

In the meantime, book a date at the registry office and get married legally as it will save a whole host of issues in the future.

Nannyfannybanny · 09/11/2025 08:13

A wedding is a wedding, whether it is religious or Register office (not registery office) I would elect to marry as soon as possible. People saying you will feel fine in the 3rd trimester,a lot of people have heartburn, swollen ankles,back and other limb pains, and feel exhausted.It does sound as though you are the one romantising the big wedding day,it's a day,I didn't feel any different afterwards, I was expecting to. Then you are protected, move the honeymoon, have a holiday. Some kind of religious or celebratory blessing later.

Shayisgreat · 09/11/2025 08:18

The exact same thing happened to us when I got pregnant and was due the month before the wedding. Vendors were surprisingly understanding and allowed us to postpone the wedding to the following year with no extra cost at all.

We had a tiny (13 people only) legal wedding when I was 5 months pregnant and then the big party a year later.

Your DP is being quite rigid for some reason - only you know if this is a fear response or controlling in nature or something else. The advice will be different depending on why.

Redburnett · 09/11/2025 08:30

IMO you should either get married asap or postpone. 7 weeks after birth is too soon for all sorts of reasons (as you rightly note). Most men have little idea about pregnancy and birth and possible problems - I recall a friend who had tiny very premature twins and the father assumed they would be going home in a few days ....
PS why do so many women on MN fail to use decent birth control properly even when pregnancy is going to cause them significant difficulties.

No5ChalksRoad · 09/11/2025 08:40

I would not be bearing the child of someone who told me he might marry me 5-10 years hence. No way.

In your shoes I would terminate, cut my losses at £4k and move on.

LividArse · 09/11/2025 08:43

Your priorities are wrong.

Marriage isn't about a big party, it's legal protection for you and indirectly the baby. As PP have suggested, if you want the legal protection of marriage and not just some notion of a big frock and favours (totally irrelevant) then you need to bring it forward, tone it down if necessary and get your dad from wherever he is if that's what's important to you. If he's in Australia he can be here before the end of the week so that's really not an excuse.

I was married at 18 weeks pregnant, which was exactly 9 weeks after the proposal, because it was important to me to be married before the baby so we MADE it happen.

You probably will lose money on what you've paid, and it won't be the massive wedding you'd planned, but unless you've got spare cash coming out your ears you need to prioritise.

Nicefreshbedding · 09/11/2025 08:44

If you don't get married until after baby is born, make sure it has YOUR surname.

Baby's name can easily be changed after you're married (if you're taking your husband to be's name).

Freysimo · 09/11/2025 08:45

Needmorelego · 09/11/2025 01:37

Do you want to be married?
Just get it done at the Registrar Office. You could be married within the next month.
A wedding is just a fancy party.
Which is more important to (both of) you?

Exactly this. As a MUCH older woman, genuinely don't understand the need for big, stressful, expensive weddings. I sure most grooms don't either. Just have a small do. We did and are still together 40 years on. I never needed or wanted a big wedding. It's the marriage that counts.

GoldenGirl85 · 09/11/2025 08:50

I completely see where you’re coming from.

sorry to be brash but your fiance sounds like hard work. Why is he being so binary and only giving you two options. I don’t see anything wrong with your proposal to push it back by a few more months so you have an older baby. Is this going to be a life of him giving you two unworkable options each time you run into a situation??

5-10 years is ridiculous?? Why’s he being so difficult.

Although not the best solution but you could get both your parents/ close friends involved to help him see sense.

Firefly100 · 09/11/2025 09:20

This happened to me. We brought forward the wedding and I married at 4 months pregnant. It actually wasn’t too difficult as everthing was arranged and only the date needed moving. It helped that we changed from a top popular weekend in July to a date early in the year no one would usually want. Everyone was happy to swap those dates!
However this was an amicable discussion between us with no dictates on ‘if no, then 10yrs’. It honestly sounds from your post as though your partner just wants a baby, not a wife. I think I can safely predict if you move this date and don’t move it earlier, you will never marry at all. Would you be ok with that? We rejected postponing 1 year for exactly the reason that we guessed we would probably never get round to it if we had baby first.
I would feel uncomfortable, based on your post, being financially dependent on this man for life - married or not! It appears his opinions only are important and goodness knows how that will increase if he has financial control.
This is now your last chance to consider being tied to him for life through a baby. Please make sure this is what you want and that he really is who you would like him to be.

HelloCharming · 09/11/2025 09:49

For 2 people about to embark on married life and a baby….you seem remarkably unaligned.

DelphiniumBlue · 09/11/2025 10:35

My advice is get married before the baby arrives.
Where does your father live that he needs so much notice? I’d have thought he could get from anywhere in the world with say, 2 months notice.
If DP is not prepared to make a commitment to you now, it’s better that you know that sooner rather than later. Everything else is just details.

Dery · 09/11/2025 11:10

“DelphiniumBlue · Today 10:35

My advice is get married before the baby arrives.
Where does your father live that he needs so much notice? I’d have thought he could get from anywhere in the world with say, 2 months notice.
If DP is not prepared to make a commitment to you now, it’s better that you know that sooner rather than later. Everything else is just details.”

Zempy · 09/11/2025 11:17

I would massively downsize the wedding as much as you can bear. I definitely wouldn’t postpone it.

Olivetawny · 09/11/2025 11:21

I was a fucking state at 7 weeks. I'd be booking the soonest registry office date they had if I wanted marry this man and I would NOT be entertaining for a fraction of a second waiting 5-10 years, JFC. Are you entirely sure about this man OP?

Olivetawny · 09/11/2025 11:24

ittakes2 · 09/11/2025 02:10

I would go through with it and ask for baby stuff for wedding presents. Your 26 very likely you’ll physically bounce back in 2 months

Not neccessarily. I was only a tiny bit older than that with my first, easy pregnancy, horrible birth, non-sleeping baby. You can't know. A wedding would have been a nightmare to me at that point.

Olivetawny · 09/11/2025 11:26

"his logic is we will give our guests without a role shifts to watch our child"

Yeah, you won't want to do that.

BaronessBomburst · 09/11/2025 11:50

Bring the wedding forward and marry before the baby is born.
A big wedding 6-8 weeks after giving birth is unrealistic, and if you agree to postpone he will never marry you. It happens all too often.

WithDiamonds · 09/11/2025 11:59

I have attended a wedding where the baby was only a couple of months old and the bride was almost 40 and she didn’t have the easiest time. Looked knackered poor woman.

Bring it forward, cancel the big party and see how much if anything you can get back. If you want the sort of big it’s my perfect day then a child of about 5 is about as young as I would go.

The size and cost of the party bears no resemblance to the success of the marriage.

Swipe left for the next trending thread