Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

Shocked to have been secretly recorded at work.

531 replies

Whataninvasionofprivacy · 24/10/2024 23:30

I work as a TA in school, and last week at the end of a lesson, the teacher called me over and indicated (behind the kid’s backs) to the class cupboard. She then whispered “Will you turn off the iPad?” I wasn’t sure what she was on about, but she then whispered that she’d just recorded the entire lesson, but didn’t want the kids to know. She had been told to do this by a senior staff member.

Am I being ridiculous to feel annoyed by this? I’m sure I should have been told beforehand. Also what about parents who don’t normally consent, they had no choice in this case.

OP posts:
RunningOverTime · 25/10/2024 21:07

But the parents up in arms about their explicit consent not being granted for any image of their child being captured, and auto suggesting a GDPR breach, they are very wrong

you’re being totally disingenuous.

There isn’t a single poster on this thread (let along the “MANY MANY” you claim) that has been up in arms regarding “any” image, so your continued reference to what happens in the park or in someone’s house is irrelevant.

Those who have explicitly called breach have done so with reference to the OP who stated she didn’t consent.

Yazzi · 25/10/2024 21:18

Whitak · 25/10/2024 11:56

Some posters yes, but most only think their precious kids can't be filmed.

It's actually really likely will be being and it won't have caused them any harm.

God this thread is so depression in underlining so starkly how little teachers think of parents; the most important role models in the lives of the children they too are seeking to influence.

Any teacher who has observed childhood neglect should be happy to see parents who care and intervene with respect to children's safety, including their data safety.

Your lack of imagination or even critical reasoning skills of how data collected for one purpose might end up be used for another does you a disservice.

Yazzi · 25/10/2024 21:27

PCOSisaid · 25/10/2024 20:44

Yes but I also strongly suspect the tens and tens of those parents in this thread aren’t concealing their child’s images for this reason.

They are just being awkward because they think they have the right to.

I strongly suspect no child’s privacy right's have been broken or breached. And it’s just a bog standard video for the sake of advancing the teachers skills.

All the reports that need to be made to the ICO, etc etc. stop pearl clutching. It’s bonkers

I conceal my children's identity as much as possible in data.

Nothing is saved to cloud storage. No pictures of them shared on social media. Have ticked "no" to collecting or sharing images on every check box possible.

I'm a criminal lawyer. The worst case outcomes that you consider parents "hysterical" for guarding against are my day job.

And even if parents are just "awkward" because they think it's their right... it is their right. Teachers don't get to decide parents' motivations for asserting their rights and decide to abrogate them accordingly.

Whataninvasionofprivacy · 25/10/2024 21:30

saraclara · 25/10/2024 00:34

I used to need to record lessons for internal discussion. No-one outside the school saw the videos, so parent permission wasn't needed. They were for me or my year group team to see the lesson from an outsider's view, and for be to reflect on it for my own professional development. Or ccasionally for a member of the SLT to use for a lesson observation, so that their presence didn't affect the children (I taught children with complex learning difficulties, for whom change in the routine and staff presence could be problematic).

My TAs did always know when a recording was happening though, as they should.

(Edited to remove a paragraph as I now see that a senior manager asked for it)

Edited

I think it was for this reason, definitely not monitoring me as recently been told how happy they are with my hard work. I just feel it’s a bit poor not to have told me.

OP posts:
PorridgeEater · 25/10/2024 22:16

"I just feel it’s a bit poor not to have told me."

Indeed it is! I hope you can discuss it with the Head (and that they can understand the position).

Whataninvasionofprivacy · 25/10/2024 23:35

Byjimminy · 25/10/2024 01:08

Not really bizarre when the TA was unaware?

Exactly! I nearly died when she told me at the end of the lesson, and I’d been sitting right by the camera, totally unaware. Not that I was doing anything wrong, but I should have been told

OP posts:
Whataninvasionofprivacy · 25/10/2024 23:39

saraclara · 25/10/2024 01:00

It's not flippant.

The fact that thousands of schools use just one company's technology for this, demonstrates that it's the norm, and professionally done. Schools go to great lengths to ensure GDPR compliance. They can't afford not to.

Most parental slips signed on admission have at least two boxes about photography. I've got internal use, one for external. We never had anyone refuse internal. A handful refused photos etc on the website or any public media.

The issue in the OP is whether TAs should be told about recordings for internal use, and it's my opinion that they should

Edited

It was recorded on the class iPad and then left on the teacher’s desk in the classroom afterwards.

OP posts:
Whataninvasionofprivacy · 25/10/2024 23:41

Shoppedatwoolworths · 25/10/2024 01:30

I’m a teacher. We record our classes sometimes to aid reflection and for feedback. The only people who ever watch them is myself and a mentor or someone in leadership. It’s no different to them coming into the classroom to observe. It’s good because we can actually look at examples of what worked well in the lesson and see things that were over looked. It’s to improve our practice. The videos are deleted afterwards. They’re usually recorded from the back of the classroom. If I told my students I was recording, you bet they’d act differently.
It isn’t any different to the multiple cctv cameras we have dotted around the school.

It’s totally different to cctv. You know cctv is there. I didn’t know about this 45 min recording of myself

OP posts:
Whitak · 25/10/2024 23:43

The class iPad is a device capable of logging in to IRIS connect. And the data protection policy will take into consideration what it's used for and how it's stored. Education clearly does fall into the categories for which it's safe and legal to process data like this.

RunningOverTime · 25/10/2024 23:48

“Education clearly does fall into the categories for which it's safe and legal to process data like this”

if the people being recorded consent

Why are you struggling so much to understand this?

Whataninvasionofprivacy · 26/10/2024 00:25

CharnwoodFire · 25/10/2024 06:17

Oh fg sake

  1. I'm going to presume the teacher was using something like Irish. This tech is a closed system - the teacher wasn't 'recording' the lesson in a normal sense - but was doing so through the specific technology which is all signed and sealed by the school/govereners/trust etc. It is not a data breach, you can't share videos in the normal sense etc
  2. It is exactly the same as having someone observing the lesson. Therefore the ta shouldn't be unhappy because there is no difference to having someone in the room. Perhaps the ta thinks their work in that lesson wasn't very good - if so, maybe they should buck up and try harder in their day to day work?

Well firstly!!!!

Never presume!! You are totally wrong! It was recorded on the class iPad. I could have gone onto it and forwarded it to my friends…you know…like your average iPad!! After it was recorded, the iPad was left lying on the teacher’s desk. When I go back after half term I bet it’s still sitting there.

Wrong again! It’s nothing like having someone observe the lesson. Sorry! Do you think I’m totally blind? You see weirdly, when someone is observing the lesson, we can physically see them standing there. However, and this is a shocker, when you are secretly recorded, you have no way of knowing you’re being watched.

Wow! Maybe I thought my work wasn’t good enough and I should try harder. So last night at 11.15pm, I was sitting at my kitchen table making resources for my English group. That was after getting home from my second job. The job I do because I only earn £12.50 an hour. This morning I arrived at school at 8am. I get paid from 8.30 am, but due to the severe lack of time yesterday, I needed to catch up on organising my work for my intervention. This was my choice and I do not get paid for that. I get a 30 min unpaid lunch break, but today it was only 20 minutes, as I was helping a child who’d dropped her food. At 3.45pm I was still there. I only get paid til 3.30 pm, but was talking to a child who lives in a hell whole of a family and is hanging on by a thread.

So given the above, is it too fucking much to ask to be told when you’re being secretly recorded???? 🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵

OP posts:
Whataninvasionofprivacy · 26/10/2024 00:28

Whitak · 25/10/2024 23:43

The class iPad is a device capable of logging in to IRIS connect. And the data protection policy will take into consideration what it's used for and how it's stored. Education clearly does fall into the categories for which it's safe and legal to process data like this.

Edited

But it was part of lots of videos on the iPad when I checked. I coukd see the clips of previous lessons on it.

OP posts:
Whataninvasionofprivacy · 26/10/2024 00:30

RunningOverTime · 25/10/2024 23:48

“Education clearly does fall into the categories for which it's safe and legal to process data like this”

if the people being recorded consent

Why are you struggling so much to understand this?

Edited

“If the people being recoded give consent” Are you struggling to read? I was secretly recorded without consent.

OP posts:
Byjimminy · 26/10/2024 00:38

Whataninvasionofprivacy · 26/10/2024 00:30

“If the people being recoded give consent” Are you struggling to read? I was secretly recorded without consent.

I completely get your anger OP - but think you may have misquoted here as @RunningOverTime was responding to
@Whitak

TiredEyesSoreHeart · 26/10/2024 00:38

Look, OP, you need to put in a complaint about this. I would be going to the seniors and saying under no circumstances are you to ever be recorded without your prior knowledge. You also need to tell the teacher this. You can reply and reply on here, but you need to actually do something about this.

Whataninvasionofprivacy · 26/10/2024 00:40

craftysnake · 25/10/2024 06:42

One post and the OP does not return

Nope! Because the OP actually went to sleep last night after posting. She then awoke at 6am, walked her dog til 6.30am, showered and left home at 7.30am and arrived at work at 8am. She then left work at 3.50 pm, drove to her second job and arrived home from work at 8pm. Is that ok?

OP posts:
Whataninvasionofprivacy · 26/10/2024 00:47

TiredEyesSoreHeart · 25/10/2024 06:45

Do people ever check time stamps on posts before rushing to demand OPs return? She posted her OP at 11:30pm last night, almost midnight. It's only 6:44am the next morning, she's probably getting ready for work now.

Thank you so much! Weird that I’d go to sleep eh? 😂😂 I have directly responded to her also. I actually worked for 12 straight hours yesterday as I have two jobs.

OP posts:
Aduvetday · 26/10/2024 05:59

Whitak · 25/10/2024 23:43

The class iPad is a device capable of logging in to IRIS connect. And the data protection policy will take into consideration what it's used for and how it's stored. Education clearly does fall into the categories for which it's safe and legal to process data like this.

Edited

Genuinely horrified that you are in a classroom. Three reasons: lack of awareness, lack of ability to understand simple concepts, lack of understanding the law and continuing to condone breaking it despite being told otherwise.

Byjimminy · 26/10/2024 08:07

Yes, basically, what I'm getting from this thread in summary is:

  1. OP was not informed so no consent given - think we are all agreed this is a breach, though some think she should not be bothered about that as it's only like cctv and big brother state is fine and dandy if you've nothing to hide.
  1. The children were unaware they were being recorded at the time but that's hunkydory as they're just kids and some parents may have signed something 4 years ago at enrolment they thought was to do with filming of the nativity etc and even if they didn't it's no worse than cctv and it's stored properly and deleted after so where's the problem and who wants it anyway? What's that, dark web you say? Isn't that just for tax avoidance or something LA LA LA LA LA <fingers in ears>
  1. Also we 100% unequivocally trust that the teaching staff who didn't bother to inform the OP the recording was happening, bothered to actually save the recording on the appropriate platform and not just quickly to the desktop as she was flat out and didn't have time to even turn the thing off properly and it doesn't matter anyway coz it's all a load of pearl clutching and that would NEVER happen coz school policies are always right and adhered to by everyone without question and Jonny and his parents are arseholes anyways so probs deserve whatever. And we fully expect she'll get round to deleting it eventually with the others with the secure delete software that probably hasn't quite installed properly or needs updating (sure she will get on to IT about that sometime) when she's done the ten tonne of marking she's got but it's all making her a better teacher and fuck the nambypamby law so THAT'S ALL FINE THEN.

Has that covered it?

SweetSakura · 26/10/2024 08:15

Whataninvasionofprivacy · 26/10/2024 00:40

Nope! Because the OP actually went to sleep last night after posting. She then awoke at 6am, walked her dog til 6.30am, showered and left home at 7.30am and arrived at work at 8am. She then left work at 3.50 pm, drove to her second job and arrived home from work at 8pm. Is that ok?

Edited

No, once you post on Mumsnet you must be available instantly to reply 24/7 Grin

SweetSakura · 26/10/2024 08:17

Whataninvasionofprivacy · 26/10/2024 00:25

Well firstly!!!!

Never presume!! You are totally wrong! It was recorded on the class iPad. I could have gone onto it and forwarded it to my friends…you know…like your average iPad!! After it was recorded, the iPad was left lying on the teacher’s desk. When I go back after half term I bet it’s still sitting there.

Wrong again! It’s nothing like having someone observe the lesson. Sorry! Do you think I’m totally blind? You see weirdly, when someone is observing the lesson, we can physically see them standing there. However, and this is a shocker, when you are secretly recorded, you have no way of knowing you’re being watched.

Wow! Maybe I thought my work wasn’t good enough and I should try harder. So last night at 11.15pm, I was sitting at my kitchen table making resources for my English group. That was after getting home from my second job. The job I do because I only earn £12.50 an hour. This morning I arrived at school at 8am. I get paid from 8.30 am, but due to the severe lack of time yesterday, I needed to catch up on organising my work for my intervention. This was my choice and I do not get paid for that. I get a 30 min unpaid lunch break, but today it was only 20 minutes, as I was helping a child who’d dropped her food. At 3.45pm I was still there. I only get paid til 3.30 pm, but was talking to a child who lives in a hell whole of a family and is hanging on by a thread.

So given the above, is it too fucking much to ask to be told when you’re being secretly recorded???? 🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵

Hopefully the advice you have got from the people who do understand the law is enough to make you go and make a big fuss about what happened. And make sure you record it all on paper. If you were minded to, I think an employment lawyer would eat the school alive for this.

SweetSakura · 26/10/2024 08:21

PCOSisaid · 25/10/2024 20:44

Yes but I also strongly suspect the tens and tens of those parents in this thread aren’t concealing their child’s images for this reason.

They are just being awkward because they think they have the right to.

I strongly suspect no child’s privacy right's have been broken or breached. And it’s just a bog standard video for the sake of advancing the teachers skills.

All the reports that need to be made to the ICO, etc etc. stop pearl clutching. It’s bonkers

I cant see lots of parents pearl clutching. I can see a number of people who clearly have up the date knowledge of relevant legislation making it clear to op that she doesn't have to tolerate being secretly recorded in her workplace.

Hercisback1 · 26/10/2024 08:29

All recordings on iris we have consent for from parents. They sign a yearly reminder as do the students.

In fairness we do always let them know they're being recorded and this applies to LSAs too. So the "secrecy" of the recording is different and perhaps where the difference in legality comes from.

Iris have a full GDPR and privacy notice/policy, and so do the school including DIPA and DPO.

Whataninvasionofprivacy · 26/10/2024 08:30

Megifer · 25/10/2024 08:47

We don't know the camera was hidden? Could have been propped up on an iPad stand on an open shelf.

Wouldn't be the first time an employee has been given a very clear policy that complies with legislation that they don't read fully (not saying thats happened here, I'm still certain their policy won't have provided for this)

The camera WAS hidden, or rather the iPad was hidden behind stuff. She whispered that she’d been recording and I could not see where the iPad was u til she told me. She had cleverly hidden it and told me she did not want the children to know it was there.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread