They seem like such a good idea to allow easy, no conflict divorces, but in the three cases I know of these in real life the woman has been absolutely financially shafted. I am not even sure if two of them realise they got shafted, as they may have never understood what they could have been entitled to if they had allowed a court to decide the settlement.
One got nothing. They had each owned a house prior to marriage and each came out with a house each. But he had a very good public sector pension that she got nothing of. I'm not sure she realises she was entitled to some of this or his other assets.
Another got the family house (but they owned two homes) but only a tiny fractin of his pension and other assets and he had an enormous pension and retired a few years after the divorce in his early 50s. She got no spousal support despite the fact she may well have being granted this by a court as she had been a SAHM all her life, facilitating his very successful financial career. She still facilitated his working by doing all the school drop offs and clubs etc and having the kids nearly all the time ( him EOW and one night a week). Given her age, she has no real opportunity to build up any sort of career having not worked for decades. I am not sure she realises she got shafted as he sold it to her as saving money on solicitor's fees and didn't she trust him more than a solicitor?
Another was too depressed after he left her to fight and ended up with pretty much fuck all.