I won't reply with direct quotes from various people in here because I don't want to post a needlessly long reply that people would tire off, like the original post, but this has to be of a certain length do the replies justice.
There seem to be quite a lot of posters who are assuming this was a troll post or something, especially as regards the bit that implied I sexually satisfy my wife. I can't prove it or disprove it, but if you don't want to believe a single word of it there's nothing I can do. Perhaps the disbelief is because I said I eventually told her I wasn't attracted to her and you assume that means "all sex since then". Obviously not - since then the sex is very infrequent and for understandable reasons. I was mentioning it because its a crux of the problem and partly the crux of the guilt - I know she is/was/could be happy and I want that for her. I can't help thinking this is a little bit of angry projection quite frankly because, if I were to reverse the genders here, and search
"I love my husband but I was hardly ever sexually attracted to him, and now not at all"
I can easily find dozens of posts like this in the forum without "I doubt you're making him orgasm :/". I know, because I've looked, because I've been "distraught" about this for some time, and in the end decided to make my own post. I was looking for advice and I do not understand what is so inherently unbelieveable about the situation other than the fact that I am male and she is female. I give the above as much space as I do because it's been so common.
Some people seem bent out of shape about the hillary mantel quote. I just thought it summed the situation.
Some of the criticism verges on rediculous, frankly "If you talk like this in real life I am surprised she hasn't left you." What, like I'm trying to write a thoughtful forum post to a completely unfamiliar group of people about something that hurts badly, looking for some advice about whether to sunder my life and someone elses to pieces, inflicting severe pain? No I don't actually.
Some of the criticism was worthwhile though - the person who pointed out I have family estrangement myself made me think. There's problems on my side of the family with spite and pride literally driving periods of 5 years of no contact between siblings, screaming matches and one fist fight that I have to/ have patched up - but they all succeeded academically, they ground into the world with sheer will and wrang sucess from poverty, and didn't sit in their bedrooms at 39 being edgy on twitter. But I take the point - No one is perfect (I'm certainly not). No family is perfect and certainly not mine Perhaps they (siblings in law) could have done better if they had a bit more encouragement and weren't allowed to shy away from the world. I appreicate that and will think more on it. They are pretty witty for one thing. It's something I need to consider more.
There have been replies that took me seriously, and I appreciate all of them even if I find the advice sad, even if they were short. Quite a lot of them say that if I really care about her I should just go, rather than recommit. And I don't really get that - see below
---Other bits
Why did I do it - becaue I THOUGHT thats what you were supposed to do, you were supposed to love someone for what they are on the inside (and I do. I can't say it any other way, I care deeply. Her happyness and sucess matter to me). Is that really so unbelievable? Do you suppose that all men only love people they are largely sexually attracted to (we do not love our mothers or daughters for instance), or would you immediately divorce your spouse if you found them unattractive? Is that the advice you would give to me if I was female?
I don't know, am I being naive here or something? Would the women here be fine with their husband just leaving if he wasn't sexually attracted to them, even if they were very happy
Because what a lot of you are saying is basically they kind of things men rant about on male orientated forums viz' "if she's not sexually attracted to you, she'll divorce and steal all your DVDs bluh de bluh bluh". Now either a lot of you are implying that, or I've got the wrong end of the stick and all those posters just think that's inevitably what I will do because I'm male. I'm sorry if I've got the wrong end of the stick. Maybe you think he will do it because he's talking about it here so there you go. I hope its the last one and you may have a point, but I'm still asking anyway.
All I can say is that I came here honestly looking for some sage advice: I expected some to say they could never get over not being attracted to someone, and I expected other people to tell me that by the time you're both 60+ you're living for your kids, some to tell me it works without attraction and others to counter it. Surely sex eventually wanders off the table, but love and family go on.
I find some of the "how dare you mention genetic predisposition of siblings" hard to believe. So you would all have married your husbands if all 3 of his siblings were e.g. still living at home at 35+?. "RandomOrder" above, I really appreciate your comments, as I do all the people who took me seriously, but when you say you would have "loved your kids anyway" even if they didn't inherit a bunch of advtanges from you. Is that really the case if they had both been male and inherited your ex's personality as well - the one you now find repulsive? As personality has strong genetic roots, I believe. I doubt it as some people have doubted the sexual stuff above, so I should probably extend the same courtesty to you I'd want and say alright I believe you, but you might be unusual in that respect. I hope you're not, and I admire your nature if that is so.
Perhaps I'm just being being too angrily defensive, and my original post came across as "bruh, I make my wife cum so many time shes coool though and I dont want to hurt her whn i ditch so just ghost or something idk bruh fam cap" or something, but that really isn't my intention. I really am just asking the same thing being asked here https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/relationships/1638739-Love-but-not-attracted-to-my-husband-How-did-your-stories-end. I'm not making some vacciliating self justification for leaving anyway (why the hell would I, to all of you, no offense) I'm not here to humblebrag, sneer, get a pat on the back or anything else
What I wanted to know was can sexual attraction come, or grow or does it matter LESS than love, do people, for instance, have children with people they're not attracted to, and nevertheless live happily because it's the children that count? That's what I really wanted to know.
Again, apologies if this has been execessively angrily defensive, but I feel a lot of the replies are either of the
A) "DUH, you're not supposed to ever marry with someone you're not contantly drooling over" variety, which frankly is just depressing if these are genuine, either because of what they say about the poster and life generally (you better be attractive, AND nice. Because nice alone doesn't cut it...ever - and my wife is better than nice) or the assumption about me/men (which may or may not be true, but is dire either way)
B) "I don't believe you" variety - which requires the tedious above explanation. Maybe I phrased it unbelievably or something.
Of the worthwhile replies, and thank you for them, there seem to be numerous replies saying that can be summarized as "leave, because it's not a relationship if you're not attracted to them".
Contrary to what some may think...I'm not enthused by that. It doesn't give me a little "out" that some may think I want (maybe I'm projecting here now)
Just hurts to be honest. A large part of me wishes the concensus had been the other way around. If the majority were saying platonic love wins because the love lasts, or this is normal enough I feel like I could shake myself mentally, tell myself to stop being a dickhead, and that the feeling of loss of that side of life (Because I strongly oppose having some sort of "fwb" or "side" or something during a marraige). I remember a line from Peep Show of a guy talking about relationships "You need the love...because the physical stuff inevtiably goes".
I don't know if there's just survivorship bias operating in the thread, that maybe people who are sexually attracted to their partners and generally have everything going right in the marraige have the time to spend more time on mumsnet etc for whatever, so the attitude of "Of course you end it" is over represented relative to the average of marraiges for whatever reason. I sort of hope it is, so the above may be wishful thinking, and posters like RandomOrder seem to indicate that at least a few are reading it who have been in similar situations, which partially squashes that cope.
A post from sjpkgp1 reads
"I often think when reading mumsnet posts "I hope the other person isn't reading this" but for once, I sort of hope she does. Do the decent thing and leave, but do it well and be firm, if you love and respect her enough, you will be kind and fair. There is probably someone out there for both of you, just not each other. The ultimate cruelty is carrying on with this sham. Only surpassed if you bring a child into it."
I'm not being funny but this does confuse me. How is it loving and respecting someone to leave them when physical attraction goes. If I'd always been very attracted to my wife, and she was horribly burnt in a car accident would I be "loving and respecting her" by leaving her? Or a woman love and respect a man by doing the same? People DO do this, but we generally deplore it. I get what you're saying if you thought I was inevitably leaving anyway and any waiting is just adding pain. Apologies if that's what you meant, but you must all take me at my word that I honestly don't know what to do, or else just leave a "I dont believe you" comment. Perhaps, again, I'm missing what people are saying and they mean "You WILL inevitably leave, so do it now". If so I wish they were clearer. It's ambiguous over the question as it leaves out definitely staying and the other person either accepting the difference, or (see below) not knowing about....
But that's the whole point of the post, and the three pages so far - I'm looking for opinions and reasons for "You can/You should/You can't/You Shouldn't. Could and do people live attractionless - do they still have happy lives regardless? If someone left them due to a lack of attraction were they alright, if not soon after but sooner or later?
Another thing I'd like to ask is, if we stay together, should I shut my mouth and/or actively lie to make sure I reduce to the minimum any pain my partner feels - is it effective and a good. Bury it, and tell her it was the depression talking. Again, I feel people are going to get on their high horse here and say "oh how terrible no never lie to not hurt someone". I would invite anyone saying that to take a moment and inventory their lives. You can claim you never did but we'd all have the right to doubt it. We are very open with each other, but I daresay when she's wanted to buck me up, she's held some little white lies, and perhaps I should just carry a big one. I'm trying, not to be bad, but not be naive.
Again, apologies if people think I'm a prick. I'm genuinely not trying to be one. I genuinely don't think I'm unredeemable for feeling what I do - I married for love not attraction and I'm evently not the first to do so, I thought it was right not because I was cringing and clinging to anyone who would do but because I was charmed by her character and she wanted it so much. I've had some hate here, and I'm not whining because frankly, I've hated myself over this, perhaps I should more than I do. I didn't think it was wrong at the time to marry and I didn't do it thinking I'd think like this at this point.
I really appreciate the straight answers people have given so far - I appreciate your time, apologies for the long post.