Like others have said I would just seek advice from a solicitor, but I'll put in my 2 cents seeing as it's a process I'm currently going through but in reverse.
Differences are we were married 4 years and have 2 young children; I'm a stay at home mum and sacrificed a career for his prior to us being married.
(Also note that I'm not actually asking for any of the properties in question or any of his business when I talk about what the lawyer has advised me to seek and what she is telling me the courts would award me if it ended up in court)
Any property which is in his name, partly his name, any of his assets, earning potential, the value of his business, mortgage potential is considered when it is determined what I would be awarded. His family own a properly business with him and there are properties that are in his name, this shows the courts that further down the line he would be in a better financial position than me, the fact he owns a business that is doing well and has a good income shows that he is more likely to be able to house himself, etc etc, so therefore considering that and considering that I don't want to "take" any of his business (as I'm named as a shareholder and joint owner even though I have never technically worked for him, but looked after children so he could) and I don't want anything to do with the properties he has in his name and the business with his parents, my solicitor is advising me that I will be entitled to 100% of the equity of the family home.
Maybe that gives an idea of how things would be weighed up, it would depend on both of your working situations. It's a lot less straight forward than i thought. There is also no point moving things into someone else's name or moving things around, because everything is found out and the courts require FULL disclosure of everything from both parties. But if you can come to an agreement regarding the property in your name, there is no reason he needs to have any of it, it depends on what you can agree on.