50/50 is what my husband wants BUT I believe he only wants that because he's under the illusion he won't pay maintenance. He said he never envisaged being a family man so it surprises me. Plus he lives 11 miles away or thereabouts and it takes 30 minutes to get from their house to where our child's school is due to the road network layout.
Personally I want full custody whereas he has them alternating weekends Friday through to Sunday. But I work 3 days a week and currently my husband takes the eldest to breakfast club and picks up from after school club whilst I do the same with the youngest to the childminder. Come September, the youngest starts school too.
I cannot get my children to breakfast club for 7:30am due to the time I HAVE to leave for work. So 50/50 is looking like the more 'workable' option.
I am inquiring to see if the few childminders there are have space for Thursday and Friday morning only and if so, I know I can hand on heart say I can cope with full custody.
Also I am not comfortable my children being in a household where:
- Their father was violent towards me in October which was witnessed by our youngest. He grabbed me, pushed me and consequently I was left with five bruises on my arm.
- The 'Bunny Boiler' that he had the 7 year affair with 'attempted suicide' by scratching her arms and telling him about what she has done which lured him back and according to him, needed a GP to check her over at home (although I believe this to be a lie as he was actually going over to be with her rather than end it as he SWORE on his children's lives).
- The bunny boiler claimed he was 'emotionally and physically abusive' towards her.
Certainly NOT the role models I want for my children. 
Any advice and words of wisdom welcomed!
Also, my seven year old asked when he was going to see the bunny boiler. I asked him if he wants to and he said yes. I know I have to at some point (it's only been a week!) so I said week beginning April 15th which is the second week of Easter - and limiting it to a day out somewhere. BUT she is NEVER to set foot on this property ever again.