I dont understand why putting the kids first means living separately ...because they don’t get to choose most of the time.
Of course if the DCs are all keen then fair enough, but when we’ve discussed it with our respective kids, they’ve all had hesitations about not living near friends, about who gets the bigger room
, who’s going to be helpful and who’s not etc. They’d go into it expecting to be unfairly treated and on the lookout for any sign of double standards. His DCs already have me down as the wicked stepmom who would make them do jobs and let my kids put their feet up, when I’ve never been anything but nice to them! Too many Disney films I think.
Certainly in my case, there’s a huge discrepancy in finances, so either we’d have a two tier family where his are the ‘haves’ and mine are the ‘have nots’ - or his DCs would have to sacrifice some of the luxuries they get in order to have a fairer situation for all. Either way someone will feel hard done by.
Similarly with friends - wherever we buy, the kids who end up moving away from their friends (even if staying at the same school) will be annoyed that their social life is affected. But moving so that nobody is near their friends didn’t make sense either!!
It just ended up being easier to keep things separate, but I do think his DCs miss out because he has to choose to be with them or with me, rather than being able to be with all of us. I think I could offer them a loving and stable home and would be a good influence on them, but for now I just stay out of it, leave him to spend half his week there and half with me, biding our time until they all leave home! (Youngest is 10 so many years yet!)