Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

Civil partnership, Supreme Court decision

80 replies

Singlenotsingle · 27/06/2018 10:34

Decision just announced that a heterosexual couple can have a civil partnership. Bit ironic really- gay couples wanted marriage, and now hetero couples want civil partnership. Surely there's no need for CP if you can get all the protection s through Wills, house in joint names etc and stay single?

OP posts:
BarbarianMum · 28/06/2018 13:25
Bekabeech · 28/06/2018 15:51

As someone who is both religious and married, I'd have been quite happy if we'd moved to something closer to the French system: the legal bit is civic, the religious bit is optional, and there is a lesser level of commitment that still protects children and assets (but definitely not the inheritance laws which favour legitimate children).

MrsBertBibby · 28/06/2018 19:07

Well that sounds like the worst of all possible worlds to me. Why should religious types get more rights for their rosaries?

LoveInTokyo · 28/06/2018 23:39

They don’t. Where do you get that from?

Bekabeech · 30/06/2018 08:07

Lots of religious types don't use rosaries!

And don't get more rights unless you count "God's blessing", which you can have after a civil ceremony if you want.

And why do people want to take away others rights - such as calls to abolish marriage now. If I want to be married why not let me? I have long supported civil partnerships both all.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page