One of tge problems I found was tgat somehow his lies in email would somehow become "fact" in the Court process because I didn't refute them. Solicitors and CAFCASS all said that a "normal" response would be for somebody to be outraged by the lies and refute them robustly. Sigh.
@horrayforharoldlloyd I'm interested in the above and where does the 'no contact' advice come from - is it WA.
I have continued to refute and challenge all emails sent by the x despite much advice on here to ignore. But I have also found that he refuses to acknowledge any email I send to him even if it is to do with kids & contact or concern for their mental wellbeing.
I have continued to try and co- parent although again I have been told I'm wasting my time and and it often feels like I am banging my head against a brick wall and no doubt is part of the reason for nearly heading into a full breakdown this past few weeks.
During the divorce I also noticed a pattern of communication with him and his solicitor where I would ask for something in relation to say financial disclosure - my emails would be ignored a few times and then they would send a fresh email which would imply they had sent it off their own backs.
I have recently come across an article on narcs and the silent treatment - this is what my x does with me - I believe he does this as an indication of his "no contact" as he has made out through various tactics that I am the one who is abusive and his "no contact" supports this.
However the fact that he is ignoring emails from me that can be backed up with information from CMS in relation to the maintenance he is paying and my claim that he is financially abusing me and in relation to my mental health due to my claim that he is still emotionally abusing me through manipulation and also the kids I would hope refutes this.
Yet again it appears that the courts and the legal profession are severly lacking in their understanding of abuse and as i have said in my case I actually felt that I was abused by my own legal representation by way of their behaviour to me in not believing what I was telling them, undermining me in their attitude that they knew better and by charging me extortionate fees before refusing to represent me any more when I started to ask too many questions that I believe highlighted their incompetence right from the start.
I was too emotionally vulnerable from the breakdown of my marriage and too trusting of the legal profession to challenge them sooner and their representation of me I believe led to me loosing the family home and coming out with a financial settlement that was heavily weighted in the x!s favour due to his lies and his manipulation of the facts which were supported by his solicitor