If you define "love" as bonding / attachment between adults, then yes, Stockholm syndrome is a type of love. This article explains that a bit: articles.latimes.com/2005/apr/08/opinion/oe-ochberg8
It's just that Stockholm syndrome is bonding that occurs during close-quarters, face-to-face violence, which is an extremely intimate thing, much like sex. It is very uncomfortable to think of it in this way, but I believe it to be true.
The good kind of love, the type that we accept as a culture as a "good thing", is usually the type that we assume has formed through non-violent closeness.
However the sad truth is that many, many relationships are formed around an attachment that occurs through violent AND non-violent intimacy. It's murky and isn't always clear - as you'll often see said here, an abuser is rarely abusive all the time. Being "in love" is not always a good thing and can sometimes be extremely dangerous, especially for women.
I explicate this because it's my belief that women are typically taught that if you feel "love" for another human being, especially a man, that means you have to be in a relationship with them. But that isn't true, because love can be formed out of terrible things. It's not a good thing in and of itself.
(I exclude the love one has for one's children. I am, as I said at first, talking about love as attachment/bonding between adults)