It's long, I'm sorry.
3 years ago I threw out my emotionally, verbally and occasionally physically abusive (to me and 4DC) husband. 6 months later after sustained bad behaviour with the DC I withdrew physical contact instead instating Skype and letter/email (he only used skype). After 20 months of this his emotional manipulation and attitude was distressing the DC (aged between 6 and 12 at the time) and I withdrew contact at their request and because I also thought it was the best thing. 3 Months of bliss and happy children ensued. I expected him to pursue via the courts, which he did, eventually.
The court process was long, drawn out and included many interim orders and a finding of fact where I was granted a residence order and husband and his DPs were warned by the judge for "misrepresenting" the facts and focussing on themselves rather than the needs of the children. Directions followed where contact was gradually increased from initial short supervised visits up to the "standard" every other weekend and half of the hols. Husband failed every stage, didn't turn up, misbehaved etc but this never stopped Cafcass recommending he continue on to the next stage. Eventually we got to the final order which came into force at easter this year.
Husband's behaviour has been pretty bad according to the DC. No physical violence but much emotional and verbal stuff. He finally "lost it" with our eldest who has the right to decide whether to go or not, now it's not although I am fully aware and have told DC that they don;t have to make a "forever" decision if they don;t want to.
Since eldest has withdrawn his behaviour seems worse, children are upset and unhappy they are now 8, 9 and 12.
Social services are not interested as we have been through court, cafcass are not interested as they don't think court would change the order for non physical abuse that was well documented at the finding of fact.
so please can anyone tell me...who protects the children. Or do we have to wait until they protect themselves by walking away?
and if that is the case what kind of legal system do we have that can't cope with restricting damage to small ones....at least mine are old enough to tell me what is going on, so many of you deal with younger ones.