I clearly need to spend more time on Relationships, although I was suspicious of the prince and said aloud "Well, if you can't marry someone you just met, you also shouldn't leave your kingdom in the hands of one you just met either." I was taken in by his Acts of Kindness in providing food and blankets to the people and thought "Oh, so he's okay then". Clearly I forgot that some abusive gits like to play the hero/saviour/etc to outsiders.
Thanks for starting this thread. I've also been meaning to start a "You know you've been on MN Relationships too long when..." thread.
So, you know you've been on MN Relationships too long when you read "Mr. Pusskins" to your 1 year old son, and feel that Emily is making a mistake taking the B cat back.
He wants "more than this dull life" so leaves and says that "Life without Emily is such naughty fun" then when he's cold and hungry he calls to go home and she picks him up. At the end it says "they realise how lucky they are to have each other". Well Emily already knew how lucky she was to have him before, why was she waiting around for the grumpy unappreciative cat to come home, why wasn't she out there finding a new cat that appreciated how much she loved him.
That said, he does seem genuinely remorseful, and appreciative of Emily when he's back home. So I wonder if MN Relationships has dented my belief in forgiveness. I realise that forgiving someone who is genuinely contrite is a Good Thing(tm) but why is it always the girl/woman expected to play this role, while the tom cats get to go off and have their fun?
Anyway, DS and I both like the book, but I've always wondered what MNetters think of Emily waiting at home for news of the grumpy cat who didn't appreciate her when she could have been out there having 'naughty fun' of her own.
(may be over analysing an otherwise great picture book)