... and just one more thing. I read on here all the time from posters (who haven't had an affair) saying that they've been 'tested'. I don't believe a word of it because if you really have been tested, you've been in a position whereby you were seriously tempted, had seriously considered what it would be like to be with this man/woman.
Not this:
MM: How about an affair then, you look just my type.
Smug poster: No, I'm married and not interested.
MM: Are you sure?
Smug poster: No, I'm married and not interested, you should be ashamed of yourself, think of your wife and children.
MM: Ok then, cheerio.
To have engaged in any more testing than that insipid and one-sided conversation should really make somebody able to at least empathise, if not offer sympathy, because being 'tested' really has the potential to throw your life in a spin. If you didn't engage in the conversation, it wasn't a test was it? It's like people slobbering over Ben Fogle as some kind of delicious being... I might be 'ripe for an affair' but it wouldn't be with him so if by some unlucky chance he selected me for such a thing, it wouldn't be a test, would it? He holds no thrall for me and never will. That is the key thing. If you don't have strong attraction for somebody then you are not subject to any sort of test, it's just too easy to say 'no', isn't it?
If you haven't felt true temptation and actually been engaged in discussion, in which case you were a potential OW or cheater in the wings - then you haven't been tested at all and have no business commenting on it because, quite honestly, what the hell do you know about it?
I'll repeat my usual disclaimer of not being an OW and not being an advocate for affairs. It's taken me a few wrong turns though in my youth (no excuse whatsoever) to know that I would never have an affair, they are destructive and akin to an unexploded bomb without a shadow of a doubt.