A friend of mine (my best friend) is going through a separation. I think the final decision to separate was mutual, but was probably driven more by his wife. He's told me how they propose to arrange their affairs, but to be brutally honest, I think he's giving too much away. He proposes the following:
To split the bills - including debts and food - 80:20, to have shared custody 50:50 of the children.
In addition to the above, he will move out and rent another property and meet all of those costs.
Whilst of course I have no desire to see his STBXW struggle, or his children live in sub-standard accomodation, I'm struggling to see why, given that he was the primary carer, he has to move out into a rented house whilst she still gets to live in the fantastic house they do have for 20% of the cost. It sounds petty becasue he has the money to do it; however, I just don't see why she doesn't move out and have him cover then rent on another place. I know it's their decision, but my friend has asked for advice - and I've sort of given it (but have not been totally forthright with it) but I do worry that his wife seems to want to separate from him, but not the lifestyle he has afforded her.
They're going to mediation - to deal with the settlement - and I've asked him to take legal advice (but I'm not sure if you can take your solicitor). He, understandably, wants to keep things amicable and his wife is questioning the need for mediation (I suspect that's because she recognises that the proposed deal is a good one).
My instinct says to stay out of it; however, I walked to the edge of the same cliff not so long ago, and he provided support to me. I'd feel bad about not supporting him. He provided moral support to me; however, because I'm legally and financially trained (commercial law, not domestic/divorce) he's being a little more specific in the advice he wants. I can't give it without instinctively concluding that she's having him over. I know that the opinions on here often differ from my own - so I'm hoping for some wisdom which lets me support him, but without becoming embroiled in the nitty gritty. Also, would like to hear from others with regards to the reasonableness of the proposed arrangement as it currently stands- perhaps it's "normal"
Thanks if you've got this far!