I'm one of the (many) posters who divorced feckless, alcoholic, spendthrift exHs. The backstory is pretty much the same as everyone else's and I've posted on here several times before.
After moving to a different town, rarely phoning DD, erratically turning up for contact etc.. ExH phoned me today to say that he didn't have enough money to visit DD this weekend.
"Oh?" Long pause where I expect he wanted me to jump in and offer to lend him (yet more) money.
"Could you bring DD over here instead?"
He apparently "only has £70 for the week" (NB rent is already paid, currently no commuting costs or other bills, lives alone, owes me several months maintenance etc..) and can't find £16 from this to catch a train over here for the day or afternoon.
On the one hand, I could go over to his town. I have friends there, as well as exSIL and BIL who it would be good to see. In theory, he could take DD to the park and I could go to a gallery or museum and have lunch with SIL.
On the other hand, I've had a very long week and really can't be bothered with the additional 3 hour round journey. (I commute this distance every working day and while I don't mind, it's good to have a break at the wekekend.) All I wanted to do this weekend was take DD to the park, buy a present for a friend's baby and go jogging while DD was out with her dad.
DD doesn't seem that fussed whether she sees him tomorrow or not but I know she does miss her dad when she doesn't see him for long periods.
I don't want to set a precedent of continuing to accommodate his refusal to manage money. I also don't want to be in a situation where he casually tags along because "DD wants to be with her mummy" and either me or his sister is expected to buy his lunch or he will sit there mournfully while we eat, telling DD that he has no food because he has run out of money (he earns well above national average wage but spends it all on booze and rubbish).
Yet again I should have just said no immediately. However, because he had already spoken to SIL who would apparently "love to catch up and go to X gallery", I said I would think about it and call back.
For years during our marriage, I would have loved to have £70 per week to spend on food for one person! This is like the occasions when he told me seriously that he couldn't contribute towards household bills or rent / mortgage because he had to pay off his "debt", meaning the hundred pounds in his name rather than the tens of thousands he had run up in mine. Aaaaaargh!
Yet again, I'm cross that I'm now wasting my time mulling over his crap. His money issues are self-inflicted and not my problem.
Tosser.