The main considerations of the Family Courts where parties are unable to agree a settlement are (in no particular order of priority):
1.The welfare of any minor children from the marriage.
2.The value of jointly and individually owned property and other assets and the financial needs, obligation and responsibilities of each party.
3.Any debts or liabilities of the parties.
4.Pension arrangements for each of the parties, including future pension values and any value to each of the parties of any benefit they may lose as a result of the divorce.
5.The earnings and earning potential of each of the parties.
6.Standard of living enjoyed during the marriage.
7.The age of the parties and duration of the marriage.
8.Any physical or mental disability of either of the parties.
9.Contributions that each party may have made to the marriage, either financially or by looking after the house and/or caring for the family.
This is why financial settlements are rarely 50/50 where children are involved. Someone has to look after them and raise them, and a home doesn't tend to run itself. The unpaid work you do, contributing to the welfare of the family as a whole is of equal importance. If you didn't do it unpaid, it would have to be paid for - and that would affect your ability as a family to accumulate savings and assets.
But you know all that anyway. I suppose the question is, can you put up with this for much longer? It doesn't sound like it!
Perhaps when your children are at school you will be able to increase your working hours - but in all honesty, do you think that would make him happy? I seriously doubt it.
I bet it would irritate him even further if you took away his ridiculous excuse for being "in control" of your "joint" decisions!
Because that's what this is all about. It's not about money, or who contributes the most. It's about control.