Hi SN, a close relative of mine stayed in secure sheltered housing for nearly two years.
Key issues seemed to be:
*Break ins by partners and ex partners (weekly)
~hence, many refuges will only take women and children if they feel certain the ex/partner will make no attempt at contact and often request no contact (including phone in case she releases details of whereabouts under duress) between woman and ex/partner for a minimum of 6 months.
*Stealing between occupants of other occupants belongings.
*Child protection issues.
*At times physical fights amongst occupants.
*Apathy towards seeking help/taking advice/counselling.
*Drugs
Key groundrules were:
*No male visitors overnight.
*No male visitors who hadn't been cleared by CRB check.
*No minding of children other than their own, in the complex.
*All occupants to be back by 10pm or locked out.
*All mothers to carry baby monitors whenever leaving child in the evening (after bedtime) to take part in activities (bingo, art, role play, education). Unbelievably, this had to be reinforced time and again!
*All occupants assigned a 'key worker' with whom they met once a week, for an hour, to discuss childcare, job opportunities, education, rights, housing, benefits, etc.
I know you are bound to do so in time, but I really think how you define the home is pertinent.
i.e. A B&B for mums and children would negate a lot of the above yet give the clear impression of being a haven. You could still make available all the advice and support you'd wish to give.
A refuge would, due to the very nature of refuges draw people under considerable mental and emotional stress and the dynamics would adjust as such, morale would inevitably be more precarious.
A hostel vs refuge would be difficult to define, in terms of groundrules and expectations I think. I haven't personally been to either but have been at a point where I've been offered an emergency place.
HTH