Am a regular but have name changed for obvious reasons.
Last year dh and I seperated for 6 months after I asked told him to leave due to his constant verbal abuse of me. He was very depressed (with hindsight probably having a mini breakdown) over long term unemployment.
He has never been the most placid of people, but this was really truly unbearable behaviour for over 18 months. Anyway, he went back to live with his parents who live a very long distance from us and begged me to forgive him (I had gone as far as making enquiries about divorce), he attended anger management and counselling and after 6 months apart (we were both faithful to each other and in regular phone contact) we got back together.
My family were very unsure of dh's promise to change his attitude, but have eventually forgiven the heartache he caused me because they know I want to make things work, which they have been very well for the last 4 months. However mil & the rest of the in laws are very angry with me for asking dh to leave and refuse to talk to me.
They have only heard dh's side of events, which I am sure when he originally went back home were awful. I admit I made mistakes, I should have realised how unhappy he was becoming without work, etc but I was so busy working looking after dc and an elderly relative that I did put him on a back burner. However, I have been thinking about writing to mil (she isn't English, and I don't speak her language well enough to speak fluently on the phone) and putting my side of things across. Is this the right thing to do?