I did post this on chat, but was advised that I might get more helpful responses here.
I hope I don't upset anybody. I'm just trying to make sense of something.
All of this today with Ken Clarke hit a sore spot for me. I was abused as a child, and was raped by my boyfriend when I was 17.
I had a brief amount of counselling for this, but found it unsuccessful and so didn't continue with it. But one of the things the counsellor said always made me think, and I wish I had questioned it at the time. She said to me that she often sees patients who have been sexually abused as a child, who have gone on to suffer similar abuse as an adult, and found themselves in several abusive relationships. I never asked why that would be, but I find myself asking now, why that is?
I am married now, to a lovely man. I believe I managed to break the chain. But whilst I confide in DH about my childhood abuse, I have never told him about what happened to me when I was 17. I don't know why, I didn't tell anybody. I guess it's because I worry it would seem unrealistic that I would have gone through that as a child, and also been through rape later in life. If I could understand what the counsellor meant by the pattern/chain of abuse victims, I may feel more confident in discussing it.
I hope this makes sense. Perhaps my counsellor was talking rubbish, but I'd be interested to know if anybody could shed any light on this.
Again, really sorry if I have upset anybody with this thread.