A regularly occurring theme, this, I know - but here goes.
I have quite a distant relationship with my mother-in-law, which to be honest suits me fine. She isn't very fond of me, I don't much like her, we are polite to one another (well, I'm polite to her - she is often rude to me, but I put it down to ignorance rather than intentional slights). My husband isn't particualrly close to her either, so we don't have conflicts over that either. Sadly both of his brothers have emigrated, so we are actually the only family she has now in this country, which puts a certain pressure on us to visit and stuff.
Anyway, she is in the habit of having ds over for the afternoon every week or 2. I have reluctantly acceeded to this so far (although she will NEVER have him at our convenience - only when she wants him) because I know that she adores him more than anything else in her (admittedly rather empty) life, and because ds in return adores her. However much she gets up my nose, I think it is important for him to have this relationship with her.
The problem starts when she ignores every rule I have, and that I have asked her to keep. She feeds him food that I don't want him to have (I am quite strict about aspartame and certain other additives), and indeed he visited her today and she said that he ate so many cakes, ice creams and sweets this afternoon that he wouldn't est any of his tea when she gave it to him. I mean really - there is NO way she would have let dh do that as a child!
She also smokes when she has him - despite me asking her not to - although in fairness my son tells me that she now goes through into the kitchen to smoke (although there is no door between the kitchen and the lounge) or does it outside. I still feel that really she should not do it at all for the few hours he is there.
But the real problem - and the reason I am sharing this - is because of her health. He is a type 2 diabetic, who refuses to control her diet sufficiently. Over the past couple of months my husband has been called twice by very concerned friends and neighbours who have thought that she was on the verge of dying - they had been out with her, and basically she had had a hypo (or whatever - a bit uncertain on the termiology here) and become disoriented and incoherent. Both occasions it turned out that it was down to her not eating properly and letting her diabetes out of control. After the second occasion my husband and I spoke to her about it, and told her that whilst we didn't want to stop her spending time with ds, we were concerned about what would happen if she became ill in this way whilst she was caring for him, and basically said that he could still go and visit her as long as they remained in her flat or in the building (it is warden controlled, and so easy to summon help). But we asked her not to take him out - even to the park - unless she asked dh or I to stay and accompany them. I felt really mean saying this - but to be honest there is no way ds could cope if she was ill - it would upset him unduly, and put him in danger, as he has Asperger and ADHD and NEEDS to be watched carefully.
So what did my husband discover today, when he collected ds? She had taken him to the park - and not even the nearby park, but one quite a long walk form her home and right on the seafront. We are both really cross with her, and I no longer trust her to look after ds and to keep him safe, not to mention the fact that she has yet again ignored me.
Do you think it would be unreasonable of me, at this stage, to say that ds can no longer visit her unaccompanied? I feel awful about it, because as I have said she has quite a lonely life, and ds seems to be her raison d'etre sometimes, but there is no way I am going to risk him just to keep her happy. And ds is going to be desolate too. We will have to make an effort to have her over here more often, and to take ds to visit (but to be honest I can only do so much - afraid she sets my teeth on edge). Am i overreacting?