Occasional reader, first time poster. Apologies in advance, but this is a bit of a long one...
I'm not a Mum (obviously), nor do I have any intention of becoming a parent, but I am currently in the process of negotiating to purchase a property with evidence of subsidence and wanted to share my thoughts. And yes, the original post annoyed me a bit.
I'm meeting the vendor in a few hours to discuss where we both stand (hence me not being able to sleep), but as he's in his 90s, I'm not holding out much hope. He's currently unwilling to listen to the Chartered Surveyor's report and am facing a Chartered Structural Engineer's costs at my own expense in hope of getting him to see some sense, but without any guarantee the purchase will progress.
Thanks to Google and some of the posts on here, I've discovered that the sensible solution would appear to be for him to start a claim through his insurance, which would allow me to purchase the property with that in place, taking on the insurance policy and the purchase price being adjusted accordingly. As he is (strictly speaking) currently unaware of the problem because I commissioned the survey and not him, he could arguably put the house back on the market and hope someone else doesn't notice it.
In his case, I would possibly excuse him because he's old, quite stubborn (like me) and is sure it's a lot of fuss over nothing.
Fircone: I'm sorry, but I don't think I could extend the same courtesy to you. How would you feel if the tables were turned and you were your prospective purchaser? I'm no Christian, but "do unto others..." really isn't that bad a place to start when it comes to living your life.
You're already aware of the problem as you've commissioned an official survey, so it would hopefully show up in any searches / report their solicitors do, so I don't think there's any way of getting around it, not that you should try to.
Check your insurance policy again, be sure you know what you're covered for and then contact them. I'm TERRIBLE at putting things off* and would implore you not to make the same mistake I previously would have and not attempt to address this properly now.
This is exactly why we pay the unpleasant evil of house insurance. Yes, it MIGHT limit your market slightly when it comes to sell if your house has been underpinned (much less than if the problem hasn't been addressed, the new purchasers can't get a mortgage or insurance at all and basically only want to offer you the value of your land) but it is more likely that they would simply be limited in their choice of insurers and mortgage providers.
Now isn't a good time to sell, no matter what the papers are spinning, and it won't be a good time for a few years. So that time would be much better spent on the limited cost of the excess of your insurance policy to address the problem now than hoping you can sneak it past someone else at a later date.
I think from your original post that you know what you were suggesting is morally wrong. I hope that you do the right and sensible thing and wish you the very best of luck in getting it sorted.
- My most recent example being refusing to take 'advantage' of Government scrappage scheme for my 10year old Rover, bullishly declaring I would drive it until it dies... only for it to do so on the last day of September, just before the majority of car manufacturers put prices up again and withdrew their best offers. Am thinking of getting a backwards tattoo on my forehead saying I SHOULD HAVE DONE THIS YEARS AGO so every time I look in the mirror, I'll remember why I should stop putting things off.