We damaged some of our bathroom, including the bath. Insurance covered the cost of all the damage, and agreed, as we could not get matching bath, they would pay for half the rest of the bathroom suite. They also agreed that as the taps do not match the new suite, they would contribute 50% of this too.
contractor is here now, fitting it. He has found that the tiles behind the sink and toilet are cracked, or badly fitted. WIth the old suite, it was not noticeable. With the new suite in, they will notice.
We have found some tiles in the loft (bathroom installed before we moved in) which are the same, and he will tile the areas that are visible, but we will be charged for the labour of this.
Do you think we should expect the insurance company to pay 50%, the same as they have with everything else? We would not be replacing the suite if the bath was not damaged. If the bathroom suite was not replaced, the damaged tiles would never have been noticed. if we don't have the tiles replaced, it will look shit, and therefore out bathroom will not look at is did before the accident.
Is this acceptable? Before I argue with the insurance company about this.