Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Property/DIY

Join our Property forum for renovation, DIY, and house selling advice.

Just need to vent - neighbour wants £60,000 for an acre of land

479 replies

livelaughlambada · 08/06/2026 10:09

Urgh, I just want to vent. We love our home - it's in the middle of nowhere, surrounded by fields. We would really like to buy one acre of land. It's owned by some people who don't farm and don't do anything with it. Land around here is probably £10,000 an acre for farmland. They want £60,000 for the acre. We just don't have it. And if we did, we couldn't possibly justify buying it - as in even if we could borrow the money, there is other stuff that we would spend it on first that is much more 'necessary'. I don't think they believe us, but it is just what it is. One of our kids loves football and would love to play on that land. It's just such a shame that there isn't a way around it. I know that it's absolutely their right and I also know it would add value to our house to buy it (although we will not be moving ever, so that is a long way off - and we just can't spend £60,000 on land that we might actually just have to sell off before the house one day). These people don't do anything at all with the land -- they have about 20 acres and it's just getting covered with brambles and crap (not in a nice rewilding way - just actual crap they've dumped there). They come here maybe once a month. I think their logic is that it would add £60,000 in value to our house (possibly true, I have no idea, but we will not move until the kids have left home and that's a couple of decades away). The MOST annoying thing is that they're somewhere in their sixties/seventies and have told us they don't want to sell because you don't pay inheritance tax on land. So it's worth just having it sit and rot rather than anything else. It's just SO ANNOYING.

OP posts:
Expatpolitico · Yesterday 08:04

If you are in the middle of nowhere and the landowners visit infrequently and presumably do not visit you, then, if the land is adjacent to your garden I would quietly extend the boundary, clear a small area, just enough for your children to play cricket, basketball or ball games. Who would know? Who would care?

WillieEccerslike · Yesterday 08:32

If the owners are upset by the state of the acre currently could you offer to clear it in return for the kids playing on it?

MeetMeOnTheCorner · Yesterday 08:39

@ExpatpoliticoOur neighbour tried this. Moved wire from a fence to annexe off part of our woodland! Do not ever do it. It’s stealing and dc can play on the land if no one notices but DO NOT take it. We made sure everyone in the village knew what our neighbour did. Plus we erected a big fence so he has a not so nice outlook from his land now. Be very careful about taking anything that’s not yours.

Tortephant · Yesterday 09:06

Expatpolitico · Yesterday 08:04

If you are in the middle of nowhere and the landowners visit infrequently and presumably do not visit you, then, if the land is adjacent to your garden I would quietly extend the boundary, clear a small area, just enough for your children to play cricket, basketball or ball games. Who would know? Who would care?

You can't clear it no. If it is agricultural and has subsidies associated with it then the brambles and so on will be registered and the land use will be checked by drone.
It's also a beneficial habitat and clearing technically needs permission for change of use to residential or for development.
As for stealing land - absolutely not, that's an outrageous suggestion you would be best deleting.

wherearethesnacks · Yesterday 09:23

KindnessIsKey123 · 08/06/2026 17:40

Hello, we had a similar situation albeit about a small piece of land. They wanted £15,000 for the full plot, we ended up paying about £4000 for half of it. It was basically a bit of land for a little garden and somewhere to park the car. It took a while because they had wild expectations about the value, we were fortunate that I think they wanted the money.

I think a good idea would be to offer to rent it for £1000 a year for 10 years? Then presumably your children might be of age where they’re not bothered, and you’ve had your use out of it. You could start off at £500 a year to see if they would bite.

Sorry you’re getting such a kicking on here.

I wouldn't call it 'wild' to want £15k for a plot big enough to add a garden and parking to a house. I know people who pay more than £4k per year to rent a parking spot near their homes.

SixtySomething · Yesterday 09:24

Expatpolitico · Yesterday 08:04

If you are in the middle of nowhere and the landowners visit infrequently and presumably do not visit you, then, if the land is adjacent to your garden I would quietly extend the boundary, clear a small area, just enough for your children to play cricket, basketball or ball games. Who would know? Who would care?

No!
I think the owners might well notice.
i have a relative who did this and I completely despise him for it. Sheer greed and immorality.
Would you like someone to do it to you? 😲

Tortephant · Yesterday 09:39

WillieEccerslike · Yesterday 08:32

If the owners are upset by the state of the acre currently could you offer to clear it in return for the kids playing on it?

It’s quite possible they receive subsidies for facilitating natural habitats, why would they be unhappy? If OP cleared it to use for non agricultural purposes it would need a change of use application and they would loose any financial benefit, why would they do that? As for not declaring, land receiving subsidies is GPS to the mm drone checked regularly.

Advocodo · Yesterday 11:05

I think they hold all the cards. It would add so much more to the value of your house. They would be fools to sell for £10k.

MeetMeOnTheCorner · Yesterday 11:09

Most small land owners cannot get subsidies! I wish! You have to be a certain size to qualify. Agricultural land is a planning term. It doesn’t mean anyone gets a farming subsidy.

ArabellaWeird · Yesterday 11:26

livelaughlambada · 08/06/2026 11:56

Because that is what it's worth when its only use to anyone else is farmland. I accept it is worth more to me than it is to anyone else. But if I had to sell, that is what it would be worth.

No, it wouldn't. And your neighbours are very well aware of this clearly.

You would sell it with the house, so a house with an acre plus of garden land. It's going to add far more than £10k value to you property. Stop playing daft.

Unexpectedlysinglemum · Yesterday 11:28

Oftenaddled · 08/06/2026 10:15

Might just be worth asking to rent it at a more reasonable rate? They'd lose nothing by agreeing to that.

I agree

mugglewump · Yesterday 11:37

The bottom third of our garden belonged to next door when we bought the house. It had been sold to them during the war as a kitchen garden, but had just become an unused, unkept piece of land in recent years. I asked an estate agent for a valuation and he said as the land had no planning permission and no access, it was only worth what we were willing to pay for it and what next door was willing to sell it for. It had no intrinsic value. Perhaps you could try this too?

Aethelred · Yesterday 11:42

I would say they don't want to sell the land.

Tryingtokeepgoing · Yesterday 11:43

mugglewump · Yesterday 11:37

The bottom third of our garden belonged to next door when we bought the house. It had been sold to them during the war as a kitchen garden, but had just become an unused, unkept piece of land in recent years. I asked an estate agent for a valuation and he said as the land had no planning permission and no access, it was only worth what we were willing to pay for it and what next door was willing to sell it for. It had no intrinsic value. Perhaps you could try this too?

That's what she's done - and they want £60k or it's not worth their effort. In fact, I expect they are not interested in selling at all, but are fed of of being approached and so just threw a number our there that would put anyone (sane) off...

What the OP can't seem to undertand is that she has no right to buy it, and no right to expect them to negotiate. It's their land, they've had it for ages and see no need to sell. Fairness has nothing to do with it - it's not hers, and she's not entitled to demand anything from the owners. She's asked, they've given an answer and she doesn't like it. No more complicated than that :)

mondaytosunday · Yesterday 11:47

I wanted to buy the plot next door to us and asked for an independent evaluation. I was told that no matter what the seller wanted for it (he said it was buildable but did not have planning permission and had a very steep slope from the street), that it was really only valuable to me as the neighbour, but as my garden was sizeable already it really wouldn’t add much value and could be seen as a negative. It remains unsold 15 years later (I no longer live next door).
Can you ask to rent it? At a nominal amount?

KilkennyCats · Yesterday 11:53

mugglewump · Yesterday 11:37

The bottom third of our garden belonged to next door when we bought the house. It had been sold to them during the war as a kitchen garden, but had just become an unused, unkept piece of land in recent years. I asked an estate agent for a valuation and he said as the land had no planning permission and no access, it was only worth what we were willing to pay for it and what next door was willing to sell it for. It had no intrinsic value. Perhaps you could try this too?

Your neighbour’s plot was already part of a suburban garden, so none of the issues op has with someone else’s farmland apply.

HoppityBun · Yesterday 11:55

SpudGunToo · Yesterday 07:26

Diamonds. Just a little piece of stone that can be found if you dig in the dirt. Why would anyone pay more for them than for a bit of quartz?

Those sellers asking for tens or even hundreds of thousands of them for the tiniest pebble, how dare they?

Exactly! diamonds aren’t rare and have been the subject of a mid C20 canny marketing strategy by De Beers to make people think that an engagement ring has to be a diamond: Diamonds are for ever. Get a lab grown one because they’re identical.

godmum56 · Yesterday 13:42

mugglewump · Yesterday 11:37

The bottom third of our garden belonged to next door when we bought the house. It had been sold to them during the war as a kitchen garden, but had just become an unused, unkept piece of land in recent years. I asked an estate agent for a valuation and he said as the land had no planning permission and no access, it was only worth what we were willing to pay for it and what next door was willing to sell it for. It had no intrinsic value. Perhaps you could try this too?

they have said what they are willing to sell it for which is 60k

MeetMeOnTheCorner · Yesterday 16:45

@ArabellaScottNo, you are not correct. Agricultural land is not automatically classed as garden. It needs change of use pp. Where I live, a neighbour had a paddock attached to their garden and wanted to demolish their bungalow and build a house on the agricultural paddock. It was refused, and at appeal. After 20 years it can become garden I believe but it still might not get pp. Depends where you live and restrictions in place. However anywhere with more land is worth more than somewhere without it!

ArabellaScott · Yesterday 17:03

You've tagged the wrong person.

Comeinsideforacupoftea · Yesterday 17:31

I mean at the end of the day the land is their's. You have absolutely no entitlement to it and tbh it doesn't sound like you're planning on doing anything a whole lot more exciting with it than the current owner. Land tends to differ immensely in value depending on what development opportunities there are. If it's worth 60k it's worth 60k whether you like it or not. The land owner could cause all sorts of problems for themselves if they sell it at an undervalued price because then they might significantly devalue their own property. The only way to do it reasonably is to have someone value the land. If you aren't willing to pay 60k and the owner isn't willing to sell for any less than this though then it's a moot point. If they might be prepared to wiggle a bit depending on valuation then it might be worth going down that road.

italianmountains · Yesterday 18:19

Expatpolitico · Yesterday 08:04

If you are in the middle of nowhere and the landowners visit infrequently and presumably do not visit you, then, if the land is adjacent to your garden I would quietly extend the boundary, clear a small area, just enough for your children to play cricket, basketball or ball games. Who would know? Who would care?

That would be both immoral and illegal. If I have misunderstood then you have my sincere apologies but it seems as If you are suggesting breaking the law to get your own way. Surely not?

MaryMayMiss · Yesterday 18:59

It's not farmland though is, it's their property. This is wild behavour from you tbh,very entitled.

MeetMeOnTheCorner · Yesterday 20:24

@italianmountains In planning terms it’s agricultural land. It’s certainly not garden land!

Namechangee11 · Yesterday 21:01

The thing is it would add a huge amount to the value of your house.... And that's what they're thinking and they aren't bothered about selling it so you need to balance the value as farmland which is 10k and what value it would add to your home, which would be way beyond 10k... Big parcels like that next to a house are worth a lot and you're valuing it as farmland... You're barking up the wrong tree here.. because that isn't a playing field that is 'room for a pony'.