House is 1930s. I assume it's original roof. Have spent quite a lot doing the property up, have only hit equal with sale price and what was spent on it. Received an offer and price was in region of and we were offered 8k less than asking price.
Survey has come back saying needs a new roof. Buyer has asked me to get a new roof, and said even if it needed replacing in five+ years they couldn't afford it so it needs to be done by us.
I'm waiting on a roofer to come out and assess, but what is peoples stance on this. We have never had issues with the roof. It does have some algae on it due to trees in the area but not leaking.
I cannot afford a new roof, the house in my opinion was priced with the roof in mind so if there is no issue with it other than age then I don't feel it should be replaced. If it does need replacing then I would expect the value of my property to increase in line with the new roof?
What would your thoughts be on this I have already accepted a lower offer at 8k so I would argue this is already a discount in itself.
I think the buyer is maxed out finance wise. I want to be fair but can't be any more out of pocket.