Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Property/DIY

Join our Property forum for renovation, DIY, and house selling advice.

Multi fuel or wood only?

9 replies

HalfGreekBitch · 11/05/2025 08:56

We are just starting to research putting in a woodburner and wondered what others’ experiences of wood or multifuel burners have been. I read that if wood only, get DEFRA approved, and multifuel not as efficient if you happen to burn wood. We live in a small town, quite rural. TIA

OP posts:
user0707106 · 11/05/2025 09:02

Do you live in a smoke control zone? Multi-fuel gives the option of smokeless fuel which could be useful if smoke control exists or might be introduced in the future.

The only difference I am aware of is that dedicated wood burning stoves don’t generally have a grate, riddle or ash box.

Jen579 · 11/05/2025 09:03

I would only ever get multifuel, we burn smokeless coal and can leave the fire most of the day or all night without it going completely out. With wood you have to put more on frequently to keep it going. You also need a lot of wood and somewhere to store it all.

Sunwarddangledhardens · 11/05/2025 09:07

Do you need DEFRA approval? We installed a multifuel last year in an edge of town location and didn’t need anything except HETAS sign off. As it happens, we tried burning coal but just found it too smelly and messy compared to wood. With wood only, it’s still fantastically efficient and a real joy in the winter.

AnSolas · 11/05/2025 10:07

Go with multi fuel and have the fire box as high off the ground as possible so you are not bending down to load it or clean out the ash. Plus look at the economics of adding in a boiler as part of the water heating plumbing.

LibertyLily · 11/05/2025 12:00

We had two stoves fitted at our last (very rural) cottage. One was a multifuel, the other wood only. We only ever burned smokeless coal once and found it smelled unpleasant so didn't bother again.

In our new (less rural) cottage we opted for wood only for that reason. We have plenty of wood storage space, although don't have our own supply here as we did previously.

Regarding the fire box height, we've twice purchased Charnwood stoves with the higher legs/log store stand which raises it higher than the basic models, therefore there's less distance to bend for loading etc.

JohnofWessex · 11/05/2025 14:45

Wood burns better in a wood only stove

Agree with adding a boiler for heating/hot water

HalfGreekBitch · 11/05/2025 16:44

Thanks for all your comments, really helpful and much appreciated 😊

OP posts:
notgettinganyyounger · 13/05/2025 16:18

Multi fuel

MrsPositivity1 · 13/05/2025 16:40

Multi fuel all the way

New posts on this thread. Refresh page