I think things are 'overpriced'???
I offered OVER asking price on most and have regularly said it rude to just expect to offer under and people should aim to pay asking. I only ever said one was over priced and frankly it was (way above the price of the area, being sold by a Londoner).
I look at houses below my budget (substantially) as I'm looking at ones that need work so if your suggesting I'm a cheapskate thats chancing offering under thats ridiculous.
I'm in the north (I have commented on the market in south seeming nuts price wise, people spending hundreds of thousands on 1 bed flats etc... is crazy to a northerner but I also never claimed they are overprice for their area just that its crazy to compare) but lots of investors from outside the area are buying here because its 'cheap'.
I might be in competition more often with developers as we are looking mainly for older dated Victorian houses (most coming up are from elderly people moving into care or probate) as I hate modern builds and most of the trends from the last 20 years.
There are of course houses sitting on the market ages here just like anywhere but they are the tenanted BTL houses, overpriced by the owners houses or flips that aren't worth the asking price (opposite of what I want).
Reasonably priced good houses 'fly off the shelves' everywhere in the country. I'm not in a need to move situation so not going to just accept the dregs no one wants (no one else wants them for the same reasons I don't).
As for 'they just must pay much more than you', the developers they have standing relations with the EA etc... they buy lots of houses again and again in quick succession and are known to the process. Usually have solicitors working for them (not just a one off hire) and so are heavily 'recommended' as known buyers with a track record.
Houses are usually empty being sold to settle estates or fees so its not a case of swooning homeowners into picking you as their favorite person who will cherish their home forever.